ArticleNeuroinformatics2022
Building FAIR Functionality: Annotating Events in Time Series Data Using Hierarchical Event Descriptors (HED).
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reconciling global collaboration and data sovereignty in neuroscience.Nature neuroscience · 2026Review
- Event Files are Common, But Semantic Event Metadata Remain Uneven in OpenNeuro BIDS Datasets.Neuroinformatics · 2026Article
- FAIR m-BIDS: Advancing brain data utilization through multimodal and FAIR principles.Scientific data · 2026Article
- HED LANG - A Hierarchical Event Descriptors library extension for annotation of language cognition experiments.Scientific data · 2024Article
- The past, present, and future of the brain imaging data structure (BIDS).Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Review
- Article
- Events in context-The HED framework for the study of brain, experience and behavior.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2024Article
- Review
- A streamable large-scale clinical EEG dataset for Deep Learning.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2022Article
- Capturing the nature of events and event context using hierarchical event descriptors (HED).NeuroImage · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human electrophysiological and related time series data are often acquired in complex, event-rich environments. However, the resulting recorded brain or other dynamics are often interpreted in relation to more sparsely recorded or subsequently-noted events. Currently a substantial gap exists between the level of event description required by current digital data archiving standards and the level of annotation required for successful analysis of event-related data across studies, environments, and laboratories. Manifold challenges must be addressed, most prominently ontological clarity, vocabulary extensibility, annotation tool availability, and overall usability, to allow and promote sharing of data with an effective level of descriptive detail for labeled events. Motivating data authors to perform the work needed to adequately annotate their data is a key challenge. This paper describes new developments in the Hierarchical Event Descriptor (HED) system for addressing these issues. We recap the evolution of HED and its acceptance by the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) movement, describe the recent release of HED-3G, a third generation HED tools and design framework, and discuss directions for future development. Given consistent, sufficiently detailed, tool-enabled, field-relevant annotation of the nature of recorded events, prospects are bright for large-scale analysis and modeling of aggregated time series data, both in behavioral and brain imaging sciences and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.