Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34970702›Full record

SynthesisActa neurochirurgica2022

Reducing complication rates for repeat craniotomies in glioma patients: a single-surgeon experience and comparison with the literature.

Ramin A Morshed, Jacob S Young, Andrew J Gogos, Alexander F Haddad, James T McMahon, Annette M Molinaro, Vivek Sudhakar, Nadeem Al-Adli, Shawn L Hervey-Jumper, Mitchel S Berger

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta neurochirurgica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ramin A Morshed *Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave., Rm. M-779, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0112, USA.
Jacob S Young *Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave., Rm. M-779, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0112, USA.
Andrew J GogosDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave., Rm. M-779, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0112, USA.
Alexander F HaddadSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
James T McMahonSchool of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Annette M MolinaroDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave., Rm. M-779, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0112, USA.
Vivek SudhakarSchool of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Nadeem Al-AdliSchool of Medicine, TCU and UNTHSC, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Shawn L Hervey-JumperDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave., Rm. M-779, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0112, USA.
Mitchel S BergerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave., Rm. M-779, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0112, USA. Mitchel.Berger@ucsf.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · USNeurological Surgery · USEmory University · USUniversity of North Texas Health Science Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a concern that glioma patients undergoing repeat craniotomies are more prone to complications. The study's goal was to assess if the complication profiles for initial and repeat craniotomies were similar, to determine predictors of complications, and to compare results with those in the literature.

methodsA retrospective study was conducted of glioma patients (WHO grade II-IV) who underwent either an initial or repeat craniotomy performed by the senior author from 2012 until 2019. Complications were recorded by discharge, 30 days, and 90 days postoperatively. New neurologic deficits were recorded by 90 days postoperatively. Multivariate regression was performed to identify factors associated with complications. A meta-analysis was performed to identify rates of complications based on number of prior craniotomies.

resultsWithin the cohort of 714 patients, 400 (56%) had no prior craniotomies, 218 (30.5%) had undergone 1 prior craniotomy, and 96 (13.5%) had undergone ≥ 2 prior craniotomies. There were 27 surgical and 10 medical complications in 30 patients (4.2%) and 19 reoperations for complications in 19 patients (2.7%) with no deaths by 90 days. Complications, reoperation rates, and new neurologic deficits did not differ based on number of prior craniotomies. On multivariate analysis, older age (OR1.5, 95%CI 1.0-2.2) and significant leukocytosis due to steroid use (OR12.6, 95%CI 2.5-62.9) were predictors of complications. Complication rates in the cohort were lower than rates reported in the literature.

conclusionContrary to prior reports in the literature, repeat craniotomies can be as safe as initial operations if surgeons implement best practices.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaSurgeonsCraniotomyHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeComplicationsGliomaRecurrenceSurgical resection

Identifiers

PMID34970702
PMCPMC8854329
OpenAlexW4200228034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.