Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34970483›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Gemcitabine Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Metastasized Soft Tissue Sarcomas.

Dennis Christoph Harrer, Sebastian Buschauer, Ulrich Sterz, Karin Menhart, Christina Wendl, Daniel Heudobler, Matthias Grube, Tobias Pukrop, Wolfgang Herr, Martin Vogelhuber

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dennis Christoph HarrerDepartment of Medicine III-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Sebastian BuschauerDepartment of Medicine III-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Ulrich SterzDepartment of Medicine III-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Karin MenhartDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Christina WendlDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Daniel HeudoblerDepartment of Medicine III-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Matthias GrubeDepartment of Medicine III-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Tobias PukropDepartment of Medicine III-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Wolfgang HerrDepartment of Medicine III-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Martin VogelhuberDepartment of Medicine III-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
University Hospital Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetastasized soft-tissue sarcomas still pose a significant therapeutic challenge given the limited efficacy of currently available multimodal treatment strategies. Recent progress in molecular characterization of sarcoma subtypes has enabled successful personalized therapy approaches in a minority of selected patients with targetable mutations. However, in the majority of patients with refractory soft tissue sarcomas, long-term survival remains poor.

methodsWe report on three adult patients with various soft tissue sarcomas subjected to Gemcitabine maintenance therapy. Tumor entities included leiomyosarcoma of the pancreas (patient 1), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the right femur (patient 2), and peri-aortic leiomyosarcoma (patient 3). Metastatic sites encompassed liver, lung, and bones. All patients received Gemcitabine maintenance therapy until disease progression following prior salvage chemotherapy with Docetaxel and Gemcitabine. Patients were treated outside of clinical trials. Response assessment was based on radiological imaging.

resultsIn response to salvage chemotherapy with Docetaxel and Gemcitabine, one patient exhibited a partial remission, and two patients showed stable disease. Patient 1 exhibited stable disease for 6 months during Gemcitabine maintenance therapy before suffering rapid progression of hepatic metastases. Patient 2 underwent 21 months of Gemcitabine maintenance therapy, which was discontinued after progressive pulmonary metastases were detected. Patient 3 is still being treated with Gemcitabine maintenance therapy. Remarkably, owing to significant chemotherapy-associated hematotoxicity, the dose of Gemcitabine dose was reduced by two-thirds. Nevertheless, stable disease with constant pulmonary metastases has been maintained in this patient for 14 months.

conclusionsGemcitabine maintenance therapy following prior Docetaxel and Gemcitabine chemotherapy is manageable and reveals potential benefits for patients with aggressive metastasized soft tissue sarcomas. Prospective trials evaluating Gemcitabine maintenance therapy are encouraged.

Indexed as

chemotherapymaintenance therapysarcomasolid tumorstroma tumor

Identifiers

PMID34970483
PMCPMC8712329
OpenAlexW4200478090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.