ArticleApplied physics reviews2021
Colloidal multiscale porous adhesive (bio)inks facilitate scaffold integration.
Article in Applied physics reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs for systemic diseases and localized injuries.Military Medical Research · 2026Review
- Injectable hemostatic foam hydrogel for traumatic intra-abdominal hemorrhage.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Scaling Cultured Meat: Challenges and Solutions for Affordable Mass Production.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025Review
- Microfluidic 3D Bioprinting of Foamed Fibers with Controlled Micromorphology.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Biomaterial-Based Regenerative Strategies for Volumetric Muscle Loss: Challenges and Solutions.Advances in wound care · 2025Review
- Cell driven elastomeric particle packing in composite bioinks for engineering and implantation of stable 3D printed structures.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- A robotic arm with open-source reconstructive workflow forApplied physics reviews · 2024Article
- Engineering large-scale hiPSC-derived vessel-integrated muscle-like lattices for enhanced volumetric muscle regeneration.Trends in biotechnology · 2024Article
- A stretchable, electroconductive tissue adhesive for the treatment of neural injury.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2024Article
- Advances in 3D bioprinting for urethral tissue reconstruction.Trends in biotechnology · 2024Review
- Repurposing biomedical muscle tissue engineering for cellular agriculture: challenges and opportunities.Trends in biotechnology · 2023Review
- Cleanroom-Free Fabrication of Microneedles for Multimodal Drug Delivery.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2023Article
- Review
- The one-step fabrication of porous hASC-laden GelMa constructs using a handheld printing system.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2023Article
- Engineering a drug eluting ocular patch for delivery and sustained release of anti-inflammatory therapeutics.AIChE journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers · 2023Article
- Aerobic exercise and scaffolds with hierarchical porosity synergistically promote functional recovery post volumetric muscle loss.Biomaterials · 2023Article
- Reciprocal interaction between vascular niche and sweat gland promotes sweat gland regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2023Article
- Additively manufactured porous scaffolds by design for treatment of bone defects.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Fabrication of large-scale scaffolds with microscale features using light sheet stereolithography.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- Translating musculoskeletal bioengineering into tissue regeneration therapies.Science translational medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Poor cellular spreading, proliferation, and infiltration, due to the dense biomaterial networks, have limited the success of most thick hydrogel-based scaffolds for tissue regeneration. Here, inspired by whipped cream production widely used in pastries, hydrogel-based foam bioinks are developed for bioprinting of scaffolds. Upon cross-linking, a multiscale and interconnected porous structure, with pores ranging from few to several hundreds of micrometers, is formed within the printed constructs. The effect of the process parameters on the pore size distribution and mechanical and rheological properties of the bioinks is determined. The developed foam bioinks can be easily printed using both conventional and custom-built handheld bioprinters. In addition, the foam inks are adhesive upon
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.