ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2021
Coercive Measures in Psychiatry: A Review of Ethical Arguments.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A qualitative meta-synthesis of service users' and carers' experiences of assessment and involuntary hospital admissions under mental health legislations: a five-year update.BMC psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Support for Human and Civil Rights in Physical Disability, Mental Illness, and Substance Use Disorder.JAMA health forum · 2026Article
- 'Traumatic to Say the Least; It Still Affects Me': Consumer Perspectives on Community Treatment Orders in Australia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Psychiatric Care Pathways and the Use of Coercion: From Pre-Hospital to Inpatient Settings.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- Association of psychotropic medications with the use of coercive measures and recidivism during forensic psychiatric care: a Swedish nationwide register-based study.BMJ mental health · 2026Observational
- From International Commitments to Local Practice: Examining Staff Attitudes Toward Human Rights in Lithuanian Mental Health Care Facilities.Health and human rights · 2026Article
- Mental Health Nurses' Perceived Appropriateness of Coercive Measures and Security Technologies in Psychiatric Settings: A National Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026Article
- Eliminating Seclusion Use for Women in Secure Forensic Hospitals. Are We Doing Enough to Consider Sex and Gender Differences for Elimination?International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
- Personal Agency Support Questionnaire in Acute Psychiatric Inpatients: Development and Instrument Validation Study.Asian/Pacific Island nursing journal · 2026Article
- Functional, Contextual, and Interventional Drivers of Formal Coercion in Acute Mental Health Units: A Feature Analysis.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
- Abuse of people with mental illnesses perpetrated by healthcare professionals: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2026Article
- More coercion, less support: A latent class analysis of post-incident reviews for mental health inpatients exposed to coercive practice.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
- Psychiatric hospitalisation; transitioning from consenting to involuntarily admitting-re-conceptualisation and a procedural framework.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2026Article
- Association of psychological resilience and social support with subjective coercion experience in hospitalized psychiatric inpatients: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Carers' Perceptions of Seclusion and Restraints in Mental Healthcare: An Integrative Literature Review.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025Review
- Patient-related characteristics or local tradition: what predicts the admission to a locked ward or the use of coercive measures in psychiatric inpatient treatment?European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025Observational
- Impulsive suicide in methamphetamine intoxication and self-reported ADHD: a case report.Der Nervenarzt · 2025Article
- Assessing autonomy in psychiatric practice: a narrative literature review.Discover mental health · 2025Review
- The Impact of Coercive Measures on the Therapeutic Relationship Between Patients and Nurses in the Acute Psychiatric Care. An Integrative Review.Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing · 2025Review
- Psychiatric Risk Governance Across Jurisdictions: A Comparative Analysis of Involuntary Treatment, Community Treatment Orders, and Forensic Mental Health Services.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.