Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34970080›Full record

ArticleBritish paramedic journal2021

Improving recording and reporting of dementia and frailty via electronic patient record by ambulance staff in a single service (IDEAS).

Patryk Jadzinski, Helen Pocock, Chloe Lofthouse-Jones, Phil King, Sarah Taylor, Ed England, Julian Cavalier, Carole Fogg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British paramedic journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Patryk JadzinskiUniversity of Portsmouth; South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6752-0807.
Helen PocockSouth Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7648-5313.
Chloe Lofthouse-JonesSouth Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8118-3934.
Phil KingSouth Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7736-7183.
Sarah TaylorSouth Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2488-7158.
Ed EnglandSouth Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8009-2843.
Julian CavalierSouthern Health NHS Foundation Trust.
Carole FoggUniversity of Southampton ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3000-6185.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDementia is common in older adults assessed by ambulance services. However, inconsistent reporting via the patient record may result in this diagnosis being overlooked by healthcare staff further down the care pathway. This can have a deleterious effect on subsequent patient care, increasing morbidity and mortality. We sought to understand how and where ambulance staff would like to record this finding on the electronic patient record (ePR).

methodsWe designed and implemented a survey of ambulance staff in a single service to understand how they identify patients with dementia, how they record dementia on the ePR and how the ePR could be improved to better capture dementia. Scoping questions on frailty were included. The survey was tested using cognitive interviewing. Analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics for closed questions and thematic analysis for open questions as appropriate.

results131 surveys were completed; 60% of participants were paramedics and 40% were other grades of front line staff. Participants reported consulting electronic/paper sources, and individuals such as carers involved in the patients' care, to establish whether dementia had been diagnosed. Frailty assessments were prompted by social context, reduced mobility, a fall or diagnosis of dementia. Staff reported documenting dementia in 20 different areas on the ePR and 46% of participants stated a preference for a designated area to record the information. However, 15% indicated it was not necessary to record dementia or that no ePR changes were required.

conclusionsWe have highlighted the variation in ambulance staff practice in recording of dementia. Alterations to the ePR are required to ensure that dementia is recorded consistently and is easily retrievable. Clearer guidance on when to assess frailty may also enhance information provision to care staff in other sectors, resulting in more appropriate clinical and social care.

Indexed as

dementia recordingelectronic patient record analysisemergency medical services

Identifiers

PMID34970080
PMCPMC8669638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.