ArticleProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)2022
Successful pregnancy with left ventricular assist device failure in the setting of peripartum cardiomyopathy.
Article in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Left ventricular assist device in pregnancy: case report of a near-term delivery with multidisciplinary support.European heart journal. Case reports · 2026Article
- Navigating women with congenital heart disease during pregnancy: Management strategies and future directions.World journal of cardiology · 2025Review
- Pregnancy and Delivery Care for a Patient With a HeartMate 3.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Pregnancy with a Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Narrative Review.Annals of cardiac anaesthesia · 2025Review
- Addressing Barriers for Women with Advanced Heart Failure.Current cardiology reports · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pregnancy is contraindicated for women with left ventricular dysfunction due to high maternal and fetal mortality. We present a case of a pregnant 31-year-old woman with a history of heart failure due to peripartum cardiomyopathy from a previous pregnancy. She had a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and was on warfarin due to recurrent thrombosis of her device. During her course, she had multiple cardiac complications, including thrombosis of the LVAD, which required deactivation. At 32 weeks, a cesarean section was performed due to acute decompensation, and a transthoracic echocardiogram revealed a left ventricular ejection fraction of 30% to 34%, a dilated left ventricle, and moderate global hypokinesis. This case highlights the need for coordinated care from cardiologists and maternal-fetal medicine specialists to minimize symptoms to obtain ideal outcomes for mother and infant despite LVAD deactivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.