Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34970014›Full record

ArticleFreshwater biology2020

Toxic benthic freshwater cyanobacterial proliferations: Challenges and solutions for enhancing knowledge and improving monitoring and mitigation.

Susanna A Wood, Laura Kelly, Keith Bouma-Gregson, Jean Francois Humbert, H Dail Laughinghouse, James Lazorchak, Tara McAllister, Andrew McQueen, Katyee Pokrzywinski, Jonathan Puddick and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Freshwater biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Spatiotemporal dynamics of benthicFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A cohesiveWater research X · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Lethal cyanobacteria are creeping into rivers-no one knows exactly why.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Polyphasic Approach and Potential Cyanotoxin Production byInternational journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 5 countries.

Susanna A WoodCawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand.
Laura KellyCawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand.
Keith Bouma-GregsonOffice of Information Management and Analysis, California State Water Resources Control Board, Sacramento, California, United States of America.
Jean Francois HumbertINRAE, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
H Dail LaughinghouseFort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Florida, USA.
James LazorchakU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Monitoring and Modeling, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
Tara McAllisterTe Pūnaha Matatini Centre of Research Excellence for Complex Systems, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Andrew McQueenEnvironmental Risk Assessment Branch, US Army Corps of Engineers, Engineering Research & Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi, United States of America.
Katyee PokrzywinskiEnvironmental Risk Assessment Branch, US Army Corps of Engineers, Engineering Research & Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi, United States of America.
Jonathan PuddickCawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand.
Catherine QuiblierMNHN, Paris, France.
Laura A ReitzDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio, United States of America.
Ken RyanSchool of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
Yvonne VadeboncoeurDepartment of Biological Sciences, Wright State University, Ohio, United States of America.
Arthur ZastepaEnvironment and Climate Change Canada, Canada Centre for Inland Waters, Ontario, Canada.
Timothy W DavisDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio, United States of America.
Cawthron Institute · NZBowling Green State University · USU.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center · USCalifornia Air Resources Board · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · USEnvironment and Climate Change Canada · CAMuséum national d'Histoire naturelle · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Fort Lauderdale · USVictoria University of Wellington · NZWright State University · US

Funding

From specialist to generalist: biotic and abiotic reservoirs of fungal pathogensR01GM135935 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI BRIGGS, CHERYL J · 2019 to 2022
$1.6M
Intramural EPA EPA999999NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM135935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. This review summarises knowledge on the ecology, toxin production, and impacts of toxic freshwater benthic cyanobacterial proliferations. It documents monitoring, management, and sampling strategies, and explores mitigation options. 2. Toxic proliferations of freshwater benthic cyanobacteria (taxa that grow attached to substrates) occur in streams, rivers, lakes, and thermal and meltwater ponds, and have been reported in 19 countries. Anatoxin- and microcystin-containing mats are most commonly reported (eight and 10 countries, respectively). 3. Studies exploring factors that promote toxic benthic cyanobacterial proliferations are limited to a few species and habitats. There is a hierarchy of importance in environmental and biological factors that regulate proliferations with variables such as flow (rivers), fine sediment deposition, nutrients, associated microbes, and grazing identified as key drivers. Regulating factors differ among colonisation, expansion, and dispersal phases. 4. New -omics-based approaches are providing novel insights into the physiological attributes of benthic cyanobacteria and the role of associated microorganisms in facilitating their proliferation. 5. Proliferations are commonly comprised of both toxic and non-toxic strains, and the relative proportion of these is the key factor contributing to the overall toxin content of each mat. 6. While these events are becoming more commonly reported globally, we currently lack standardised approaches to detect, monitor, and manage this emerging health issue. To solve these critical gaps, global collaborations are needed to facilitate the rapid transfer of knowledge and promote the development of standardised techniques that can be applied to diverse habitats and species, and ultimately lead to improved management.

Indexed as

cyanotoxinsecologylakesmonitoringrisk assessmentriverstoxin production

Identifiers

PMID34970014
PMCPMC8715960
OpenAlexW3034493213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.