Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34969955›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2022

Infiltration pattern predicts metastasis and progression better than the T-stage and grade in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a proposal for a novel infiltration-based morphologic grading.

Orhun Cig Taskin, Michelle D Reid, Pelin Bagci, Serdar Balci, Ayse Armutlu, Deniz Demirtas, Burcin Pehlivanoglu, Burcu Saka, Bahar Memis, Emine Bozkurtlar and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Gynecologic oncology reports · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Neuroendocrine tumors].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Orhun Cig TaskinDepartment of Pathology, Koc University School of Medicine and Koc University Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), Istanbul, Turkey.
Michelle D ReidDepartment of Pathology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Pelin BagciDepartment of Pathology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Serdar BalciDepartment of Pathology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7852-3851
Ayse ArmutluDepartment of Pathology, Koc University School of Medicine and Koc University Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), Istanbul, Turkey.
Deniz DemirtasKoc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Burcin PehlivanogluDepartment of Pathology, Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Burcu SakaDepartment of Pathology, Koc University School of Medicine and Koc University Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), Istanbul, Turkey.
Bahar MemisDepartment of Pathology, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Emine BozkurtlarDepartment of Pathology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Can Berk LeblebiciDepartment of Pathology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Adelina BirceanuDepartment of Pathology, Spitalul Clinic Sfânta Maria, Bucuresti, Romania.
Yue XueDepartment of Pathology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mert ErkanDepartment of Surgery, Koc University School of Medicine and Koc University Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), Istanbul, Turkey.
Yersu KapranDepartment of Pathology, Koc University School of Medicine and Koc University Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), Istanbul, Turkey.
Arzu BaygulDepartment of Statistics, Koc University School of Medicine and Koc University Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), Istanbul, Turkey.
Cenk SokmensuerDepartment of Pathology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Aldo ScarpaDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology and ARC-NET Research Centre, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1678-739X
Claudio LuchiniDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology and ARC-NET Research Centre, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4901-4908
Olca BasturkDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2747-1366
Volkan AdsayDepartment of Pathology, Koc University School of Medicine and Koc University Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), Istanbul, Turkey. vadsay@kuh.ku.edu.tr.
Koç University · TREmory University · USHacettepe University · TRMarmara University · TRUniversity of Verona · ITDokuz Eylül University · TRMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USŞişli Etfal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advancing edge profile is a powerful determinant of tumor behavior in many organs. In this study, a grading system assessing the tumor-host interface was developed and tested in 181 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs), 63 of which were <=2 cm. Three tumor slides representative of the spectrum (least, medium, and most) of invasiveness at the advancing edge of the tumor were selected, and then each slide was scored as follows. Well-demarcated/encapsulated, 1 point; Mildly irregular borders and/or minimal infiltration into adjacent tissue, 2 points; Infiltrative edges with several clusters beyond the main tumor but still relatively close, and/or satellite demarcated nodules, 3 points; No demarcation, several cellular clusters away from the tumor, 4 points; Exuberantly infiltrative pattern, scirrhous growth, dissecting the normal parenchymal elements, 5 points. The sum of the rankings on the three slides was obtained. Cases with scores of 3-6 were defined as "non/minimally infiltrative" (NI; n = 77), 7-9 as "moderately infiltrative" (MI; n = 68), and 10-15 as "highly infiltrative" (HI; n = 36). In addition to showing a statistically significant correlation with all the established signs of aggressiveness (grade, size, T-stage), this grading system was found to be the most significant predictor of adverse outcomes (metastasis, progression, and death) on multivariate analysis, more strongly than T-stage, while Ki-67 index did not stand the multivariate test. As importantly, cases <=2 cm were also stratified by this grading system rendering it applicable also to this group that is currently placed in "watchful waiting" protocols. In conclusion, the proposed grading system has a strong, independent prognostic value and therefore should be considered for integration into routine pathology practice after being evaluated in validation studies with larger series.

Indexed as

Neuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm GradingPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID34969955
OpenAlexW4200201227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.