Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34969398›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2021

Assessing the usefulness of policy brief and policy dialogue as knowledge translation tools towards contextualizing the accountability framework for routine immunization at a subnational level in Nigeria.

Lawrence Ulu Ogbonnaya, Ijeoma Nkem Okedo-Alex, Ifeyinwa Chizoba Akamike, Benedict Azuogu, Henry Urochukwu, Ogbonnaya Ogbu, Chigozie Jesse Uneke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lawrence Ulu OgbonnayaAfrican Institute for Health Policy and Health Systems, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria.
Ijeoma Nkem Okedo-AlexAfrican Institute for Health Policy and Health Systems, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria.
Ifeyinwa Chizoba AkamikeAfrican Institute for Health Policy and Health Systems, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria. ifeyakamike@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7284-6377
Benedict AzuoguAfrican Institute for Health Policy and Health Systems, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria.
Henry UrochukwuAfrican Institute for Health Policy and Health Systems, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria.
Ogbonnaya OgbuAfrican Institute for Health Policy and Health Systems, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria.
Chigozie Jesse UnekeAfrican Institute for Health Policy and Health Systems, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria.
Federal Teaching Hospital Abakaliki · NGEbonyi State University · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence suggests that implementing an accountability mechanism such as the accountability framework for routine immunization in Nigeria (AFRIN) will improve routine immunization (RI) performance. The fact that the AFRIN, which was developed in 2012, still had not been operationalized at the subnational level (Ebonyi State) by 2018 may in part account for the poor RI coverage (33%) in 2017. Knowledge translation (KT) is defined as the methods for closing the gaps from knowledge to practice. Policy briefs (useful in communicating research findings to policy-makers) and policy dialogues (that enable stakeholders to understand research evidence and create context-resonant implementation plans) are two KT tools. This study evaluated their usefulness in enabling policy-makers to contextualize AFRIN in Ebonyi State, Nigeria.

methodsThe study design was cross-sectional descriptive with mixed-methods data collection. A policy brief developed from AFRIN guided deliberations in a 1-day multi-stakeholder policy dialogue by 30 policy actors. The usefulness of the KT tools in contextualizing policy recommendations in the AFRIN was assessed using validated questionnaires developed at McMaster University, Canada.

resultsAt the end of the policy dialogue, the policy options in the policy brief were accepted but their implementation strategies were altered to suit the local context. The respondents' mean ratings (MNR) of the overall usefulness of the policy brief and the policy dialogue in contextualizing the implementation strategies were 6.39 and 6.67, respectively, on a seven-point Likert scale (very useful). The MNR of the different dimensions of the policy brief and policy dialogue ranged from 6.17 to 6.60 and from 6.10 to 6.83, respectively (i.e. moderately helpful to very helpful).

conclusionThe participants perceived the KT tools (policy brief and policy dialogue) as being very useful in contextualizing policy recommendations in a national policy document into state context-resonant implementable recommendations. We recommend the use of these KT tools in operationalizing AFRIN at the subnational level in Nigeria.

Indexed as

Policy MakingTranslational Science, BiomedicalCross-Sectional StudiesHealth PolicyHumansNigeriaSocial ResponsibilityVaccinationAccountability frameworkKnowledge translationNigeriaPolicy briefPolicy dialogueRoutine immunization

Identifiers

PMID34969398
PMCPMC8717671
OpenAlexW4200491809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.