Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34969373›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2021

Barriers and attitudes towards cervical cancer screening in primary healthcare in Poland - doctors' perspective.

Katarzyna Nessler, Francis Ball, Sze Kay Florence Chan, Michal Chwalek, Anna Krztoń-Królewiecka, Adam Windak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katarzyna NesslerDepartment of Family Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Bocheńska 4, 31-061, Kraków, Poland. katarzynanessler@gmail.com.
Francis BallDepartment of Family Medicine, Students' Family Medicine Interest Group, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Sze Kay Florence ChanDepartment of Family Medicine, Students' Family Medicine Interest Group, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Michal ChwalekDepartment of Family Medicine, Students' Family Medicine Interest Group, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Anna Krztoń-KrólewieckaDepartment of Family Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Bocheńska 4, 31-061, Kraków, Poland.
Adam WindakDepartment of Family Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Bocheńska 4, 31-061, Kraków, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare systems have adopted different strategies to reduce the burden of cervical cancer. In Poland, a population-based screening program was implemented in 2006, leading to a downward trend in cervical cancer burden. However, screening rates are still low in relation to other EU member states. In Poland, Pap smears are mainly performed by gynecologists rather than Primary Health Care (PHC) physicians. Little is known about the experiences and attitudes of the latter regarding cervical cancer screening in a PHC setting.

methodsA cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was carried out among 43 PHC physicians from the Malopolska region in Poland. Barriers and attitudes towards cytology in a PHC setting were evaluated.

resultsApproximately 35% of surveyed physicians reported having experience in performing cytology. Almost 75% of PHC physicians lacked the necessary equipment in their office to perform the screening. None of the studied physicians performed Pap smears in their office at the time. The reasons included: shortage of competence (78.57%) and time (69.05%), the perception of Pap smears as a task for gynecologists (69.05%), the lack of financial incentives (61.90%), and the belief that their patients would be unwilling to undergo the test in their PHC physician's office (33.33%). More than three quarters (76.74%) declared they would be ready to perform Pap smears if the tests were additionally paid. No significant associations between PHC physicians' characteristics and their willingness to perform cytology screening were found.

conclusionThe primary barrier to perform Pap smears by PHC physicians does not lie in their personal reluctance but in the organization of the healthcare system. Provision of required training and proper funding allocation can likely improve the screening rate of cervical cancer in Poland.

Indexed as

PhysiciansUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMass ScreeningPapanicolaou TestPolandPrimary Health CareCancerCancer epidemiologyCervixGeneral practiceHealth behaviourPreventive medicine

Identifiers

PMID34969373
PMCPMC8717668
OpenAlexW4200565989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.