Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34969365›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2021

Earning opportunities and informal payment as influencing factors in medical students' speciality choice.

András Mohos, Thomas Frese, László Kolozsvári, József Rinfel, Albert Varga, Csenge Hargittay, Dalma Csatlós, Péter Torzsa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

András MohosFaculty of Medicine, Department Family Medicine, University of Szeged, 6725 Tisza Lajos krt. 109, Szeged, Hungary. mohosandris@gmail.com.
Thomas FreseInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Straße 8, 06112, Halle/Saale, Germany.
László KolozsváriDepartment of Family and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4028 Kassai út 26, Debrecen, Hungary.
József RinfelInstitute of Primary Care, University of Pécs, 7623 Rákoczi St. 2, Pécs, Hungary.
Albert VargaFaculty of Medicine, Department Family Medicine, University of Szeged, 6725 Tisza Lajos krt. 109, Szeged, Hungary.
Csenge HargittayDepartment of Family Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Stáhly u. 9, Budapest, Hungary.
Dalma CsatlósDepartment of Family Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Stáhly u. 9, Budapest, Hungary.
Péter TorzsaDepartment of Family Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Stáhly u. 9, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Hungarian primary care system faces a severe shortage of family physicians. Medical students' perceptions of family medicine need to be known and medical students need to be given appropriate and comprehensible information about this speciality. The expected future salary is an important factor in career choice. Most of the family doctors are self-employed and the practices have a corrected capitation-type financing. Although the majority of health care services are covered by social health insurance and are provided for the insured patients free of charge, informal payment is an existing phenomenon with different motivations and consequences. This study aimed to investigate medical students' knowledge about their future earning opportunities and their attitudes towards informal payment.

methodsA cross sectional survey with a self-administered questionnaire was conducted. Each of the four Hungarian medical universities were represented by their medical students who attended family medicine lectures in person from December 2019 to April 2020. The students were asked about their career plans, about their estimations of current and ideal expected salaries and about the effect of expected income for the choice of specialisation. Their attitudes towards informal payment were assessed.

resultsResponse rate was 67.3% (N = 465/691). Almost two-thirds of the participants were women. Only 5% of the respondents (N = 23/462) plan to work as a family doctor in the future. The vast majority (91.9%) of the students had already thought about their future income. On a 10-point Likert scale (1 = 'no influence', 10 = 'very big influence') 76% answered that the expected future income exerts a considerable (≥5 Likert points) influence on their career choice in general. The mean of the ideal expected monthly income of the residents, GPs and other specialists was €1154 ± 648, €1696 ± 904 and €2174 ± 1594, respectively. The mean of the monthly income for a GP, as estimated by the studenst, was €1140 in rural and €1122 in urban settings. More than four-fifths of the students (N = 375/453) rejected the practice of informal payment.

conclusionsExpected salaray is one important aspect in the career choice of medical students, students wish to have more information on this topic. The reported ideal incomes are higher than those expected. This points to a relevant gap. However, most of the students do not accept informal payment as a possibility to close this gap. The expected and the ideal income differ from the real incomes of Hungarian GPs - this indicates the need of bringing objectoive information to the students to enhance attractivity of GP as a carer choice.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalCareer ChoiceCross-Sectional StudiesFamily PracticeFemaleHumansSpecializationSurveys and QuestionnairesCareer choiceFamily physicianHungaryIncomeInformal paymentMedical student

Identifiers

PMID34969365
PMCPMC8716841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.