Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34969254›Full record

ArticleAIDS research and human retroviruses2022

Users' Preferred Characteristics of Vaginal Rings for HIV Prevention: A Qualitative Analysis of Two Phase I Trials.

Imogen Hawley, Mei Song, Rachel Scheckter, Tara McClure, Jeanna Piper, Beatrice A Chen, Craig Hoesley, Albert Y Liu, Ariane van der Straten

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS research and human retroviruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03234400 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase 1, Randomized Pharmacokinetics and Safety Study of Extended Duration Dapivirine Vaginal Rings

TypeinterventionalSponsorInternational Partnership for Microbicides, Inc.Ran2017 to 2019Enrolled49ConditionsHIV-1-infectionArmsDapivirine Vaginal Ring, 25 mg, Dapivirine Vaginal Ring, 100 mg, Dapivirine Vaginal Ring, 200 mg
NCT03670355 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase 1, Randomized Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of a 90 Day Intravaginal Ring Containing Tenofovir

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)Ran2019 to 2019Enrolled49ConditionsHIV InfectionsArmsTenofovir (TFV) IVR, Placebo IVR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Imogen HawleyGlobal Public Health Impact Center, RTI International, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5446-5976
Mei SongMagee-Womens Research Institute, Microbicide Trials Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Rachel ScheckterFamily Health International 360, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Tara McClureFamily Health International 360, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jeanna PiperNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, DAIDS, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Beatrice A ChenUniversity of Pittsburgh/Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Craig HoesleyDepartment of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Albert Y LiuBridge HIV at the San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, California, USA.
Ariane van der StratenDepartment of Medicine, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

Funding

Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI068633 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI HILLIER, SHARON L. · 2011 to 2021
$175.0M
Statistical and Data Management Center (SDMC): Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI068615 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BROWN, ELIZABETH RENATA · 2011 to 2021
$66.5M
WG3: HIV, Co-infections and Co-morbiditiesP30AI036219 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Alan David Levine · 1994 to 2026
$50.0M
University of Pittsburgh Clinical Trials UnitUM1AI069494 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SUSAN L KOLETAR, John W Mellors · 2012 to 2026
$38.0M
San Francisco Vaccine and Prevention UnitUM1AI069496 · NIAID · PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES · PI Susan Buchbinder, Diane V Havlir · 2012 to 2026
$30.5M
Laboratory Center (LC): Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI106707 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI MELLORS, JOHN W, ROHAN, LISA CENCIA · 2014 to 2021
$27.1M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI036219NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068615NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068633NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069494NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069496NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI106707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaginal rings address a critical need for an independently initiated, long-acting HIV prevention method, but their design must be acceptable to promote uptake and adherence. Human-centered design (HCD) may help address design preference questions. In two Phase I studies of vaginal rings for HIV prevention conducted in the United States, we used qualitative interviews to assess participants' perceptions and opinions of the physical characteristics of the ring they used and of a ring's physical characteristics after comparing four ring designs presented via a visual tool. Users were found to prefer ring designs that appear easy to use, are physically comfortable, that function well, and are aesthetically pleasing. The parameters for these features varied widely. Product developers and marketers should consider marketing messages in which the target users feel this product is made to meet their needs and desires. Product developers are encouraged to design using HCD early in ring development (Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT03234400 and NCT03670355).

Indexed as

Contraceptive Devices, FemaleHIV InfectionsFemaleHumansHIV preventionhuman-centered designqualitative researchvaginal ringsvisual tools

Identifiers

PMID34969254
PMCPMC9048173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.