Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34969055›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Active pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine groups: Their group identities and attitudes toward science.

Józef Maciuszek, Mateusz Polak, Katarzyna Stasiuk, Dariusz Doliński

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Systematic documentation of the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines in Latin America and the Caribbean.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Rational and irrational vaccine hesitancy.Israel journal of health policy research · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. A targeted approach to vaccine hesitancy.Oxford open immunology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Józef MaciuszekInstitute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Management and Social Communication, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
Mateusz PolakInstitute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Management and Social Communication, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5646-3026
Katarzyna StasiukInstitute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Management and Social Communication, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
Dariusz DolińskiInstitute of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology in Wroclaw, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wroclaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine rejection is a problem severely impacting the global society, especially considering the COVID-19 outbreak. The need to understand the psychological mechanisms underlying the active involvement of the pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine movements is therefore very important both from a theoretical and practical perspective. This paper investigates the group identities of people with positive and negative attitudes towards vaccination, and their attitudes toward general science. A targeted sample study of 192 pro-vaccine and 156 anti-vaccine group members showed that the group identity of pro-vaccine individuals is higher than of anti-vaccine individuals. and that both pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine individuals had a positive attitude toward science. Results are discussed in context of the heterogeneity of motivations causing vaccine rejection and the relation between active involvement in online discussion and group identity.

Indexed as

Anti-Vaccination MovementCOVID-19AdolescentAdultAgedAttitudeCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOnline Social NetworkingPandemicsSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationYoung AdultCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34969055
PMCPMC8717991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.