Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34968394›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

The challenge of involving old patients with polypharmacy in their medication during hospitalization in a medical emergency department: An ethnographic study.

Pia Keinicke Fabricius, Ove Andersen, Karina Dahl Steffensen, Jeanette Wassar Kirk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Communication Processes Related to Decision-Making in Medication Management Between Healthcare Providers, Older People and Their Carers: A Systematic Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pia Keinicke FabriciusDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8199-9730
Ove AndersenDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Karina Dahl SteffensenDepartment of Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Jeanette Wassar KirkDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2680-0917
University of Copenhagen · DKAarhus University · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMore than 70% of patients admitted to emergency departments (EDs) in Denmark are older patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy vulnerable to adverse events and poor outcomes. Research suggests that patient involvement and shared decision-making (SDM) could optimize the treatment of older patients with polypharmacy. The patients become more aware of potential outcomes and, therefore, often tend to choose less medication. However, implementing SDM in clinical practice is challenging if it does not fit into existing workflows and healthcare systems.

aimThe aim was to explore the determinants of patient involvement in decisions made in the ED about the patient's medication.

methodsThe design was a qualitative ethnographic study. We observed forty-eight multidisciplinary healthcare professionals in two medical EDs focusing on medication processes and patient involvement in medication. Based on field notes, we developed a semi-structured interview guide. We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals to elaborate on the findings. Data were analyzed with thematic analyses.

findingsWe found five themes (determinants) which affected patient involvement in decisions about medicine in the ED: 1) blurred roles among multidisciplinary healthcare professionals, 2) older patients with polypharmacy increase complexity, 3) time pressure, 4) faulty IT- systems, and 5) the medicine list as a missed enabler of patient involvement.

conclusionThere are several barriers to patient involvement in decisions about medicine in the ED and some facilitators. A tailored medication conversation guide based on the SDM methodology combined with the patient's printed medicine list and well-functioning IT- systems can function as a boundary object, ensuring the treatment is optimized and aligned with the patient's preferences and goals.

Indexed as

Anthropology, CulturalDecision Making, SharedEmergency Service, HospitalPolypharmacyAgedAged, 80 and overAttitude of Health PersonnelCommunicationDecision MakingDenmarkGeriatricsHealth PersonnelHealth Services for the AgedHospitalizationHumansMultimorbidity

Identifiers

PMID34968394
PMCPMC8717970
OpenAlexW4200379206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.