Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34968385›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Realistic retinal modeling unravels the differential role of excitation and inhibition to starburst amacrine cells in direction selectivity.

Elishai Ezra-Tsur, Oren Amsalem, Lea Ankri, Pritish Patil, Idan Segev, Michal Rivlin-Etzion

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elishai Ezra-TsurDepartment of Brain Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1304-8022
Oren AmsalemDepartment of Neurobiology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-8070-0378
Lea AnkriDepartment of Brain Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-7622-6239
Pritish PatilDepartment of Brain Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-2655-4090
Idan SegevDepartment of Neurobiology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Michal Rivlin-EtzionDepartment of Brain Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-1310-3370

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal direction-selectivity originates in starburst amacrine cells (SACs), which display a centrifugal preference, responding with greater depolarization to a stimulus expanding from soma to dendrites than to a collapsing stimulus. Various mechanisms were hypothesized to underlie SAC centrifugal preference, but dissociating them is experimentally challenging and the mechanisms remain debatable. To address this issue, we developed the Retinal Stimulation Modeling Environment (RSME), a multifaceted data-driven retinal model that encompasses detailed neuronal morphology and biophysical properties, retina-tailored connectivity scheme and visual input. Using a genetic algorithm, we demonstrated that spatiotemporally diverse excitatory inputs-sustained in the proximal and transient in the distal processes-are sufficient to generate experimentally validated centrifugal preference in a single SAC. Reversing these input kinetics did not produce any centrifugal-preferring SAC. We then explored the contribution of SAC-SAC inhibitory connections in establishing the centrifugal preference. SAC inhibitory network enhanced the centrifugal preference, but failed to generate it in its absence. Embedding a direction selective ganglion cell (DSGC) in a SAC network showed that the known SAC-DSGC asymmetric connectivity by itself produces direction selectivity. Still, this selectivity is sharpened in a centrifugal-preferring SAC network. Finally, we use RSME to demonstrate the contribution of SAC-SAC inhibitory connections in mediating direction selectivity and recapitulate recent experimental findings. Thus, using RSME, we obtained a mechanistic understanding of SACs' centrifugal preference and its contribution to direction selectivity.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAlgorithmsAmacrine CellsAnimalsComputational BiologyMiceRetinaRetinal Ganglion CellsVisual Pathways

Identifiers

PMID34968385
PMCPMC8754344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.