ArticleHuman genetics2022
Embeddings from protein language models predict conservation and variant effects.
Article in Human genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
104 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 167 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protein Sequence Analysis landscape: A Systematic Review of Task Types, Databases, Datasets, Word Embeddings Methods, and Language Models.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025Pooled it
- Epigenetic insights into extreme longevity in the world's oldest terrestrial animal, Jonathan.Science advances · 2026Article
- Hierarchical Organization of Evolutionary Constraint in Duplicated EF-Hand Motifs.Journal of molecular evolution · 2026Article
- EmmaEmb: A quantitative framework for analyzing embedding spaces in molecular biology.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- SPPIDER-seq: sequence-based partner-aware predictor of protein-protein interaction sites.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- BindPred: a framework for predicting protein-protein binding affinity from language model embeddings.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Limitations of the refolding pipeline for de novo protein design.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- Bio-BLIP: A Multimodal Architecture for Transferable Reasoning in Genomic Variant Interpretation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- SPPIDER-seq: Sequence-based partner-aware predictor of protein-protein interaction sites.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Rapid directed evolution guided by protein language models and epistatic interactions.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- The role of protein embeddings for protein-protein interaction prediction with graph neural networks.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Proteome-wide prediction of the functional impact of missense variants with ProteoCast.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Quantifying uncertainty in protein representations across models and tasks.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Identifying microbial protease allergens through protein language model-guided homology.Cell systems · 2026Article
- Inferring context-specific site variation with evotuned protein language models.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- A survey of downstream applications of evolutionary scale modeling protein language models.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026Review
- Protein language models enable accurate viral host range prediction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- From single-sequences to evolutionary trajectories: protein language models capture the evolutionary potential of SARS-CoV-2.Nature communications · 2026Article
- BOLD-GPCRs: A Transformer-Powered App for Predicting Ligand Bioactivity and Mutational Effects across Class A GPCRs.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Harnessing artificial intelligence for genomic variant prediction: advances, challenges, and future directions.GigaScience · 2026Review
44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants stressed the demand for tools allowing to interpret the effect of single amino acid variants (SAVs) on protein function. While Deep Mutational Scanning (DMS) sets continue to expand our understanding of the mutational landscape of single proteins, the results continue to challenge analyses. Protein Language Models (pLMs) use the latest deep learning (DL) algorithms to leverage growing databases of protein sequences. These methods learn to predict missing or masked amino acids from the context of entire sequence regions. Here, we used pLM representations (embeddings) to predict sequence conservation and SAV effects without multiple sequence alignments (MSAs). Embeddings alone predicted residue conservation almost as accurately from single sequences as ConSeq using MSAs (two-state Matthews Correlation Coefficient-MCC-for ProtT5 embeddings of 0.596 ± 0.006 vs. 0.608 ± 0.006 for ConSeq). Inputting the conservation prediction along with BLOSUM62 substitution scores and pLM mask reconstruction probabilities into a simplistic logistic regression (LR) ensemble for Variant Effect Score Prediction without Alignments (VESPA) predicted SAV effect magnitude without any optimization on DMS data. Comparing predictions for a standard set of 39 DMS experiments to other methods (incl. ESM-1v, DeepSequence, and GEMME) revealed our approach as competitive with the state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods using MSA input. No method outperformed all others, neither consistently nor statistically significantly, independently of the performance measure applied (Spearman and Pearson correlation). Finally, we investigated binary effect predictions on DMS experiments for four human proteins. Overall, embedding-based methods have become competitive with methods relying on MSAs for SAV effect prediction at a fraction of the costs in computing/energy. Our method predicted SAV effects for the entire human proteome (~ 20 k proteins) within 40 min on one Nvidia Quadro RTX 8000. All methods and data sets are freely available for local and online execution through bioembeddings.com, https://github.com/Rostlab/VESPA , and PredictProtein.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.