Trial reportEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2022
Improved myocardial blood flow estimation with residual activity correction and motion correction in
Trial report in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utility ofCirculation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2025Trial
- Subendocardial quantification enhances coronary artery disease detection inEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Trial
- Automatic motion correction for myocardial blood flow estimation improves diagnostic performance for coronary artery disease inJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2025Trial
- First Total-Body Kinetics Study ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026Article
- The impact of motion correction on quantitatively measured perfusion indices using cardiac-dedicated dynamic CZT-SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.EJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Dynamic frame-by-frame motion correction forEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Virtual myocardial blood flow and flow reserve from static PET imaging using artificial intelligence.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Multicenter evaluation of interpretable AI for coronary artery disease diagnosis from PET biomarkers.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2025Article
- The clinical promise ofNature cardiovascular research · 2025Article
- Duration of adenosine-induced myocardial hyperaemia: insights from quantitative 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2024Article
- [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Higher accuracy of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Expression of fibroblast activation protein in lung cancer and its correlation with tumor glucose metabolism and histopathology.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Quantification of myocardial blood flow using PET: Current status, clinical applications, and future directions.Progress in cardiovascular diseasesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe sought to evaluate the diagnostic performance for coronary artery disease (CAD) of myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantification with
methodsIn total, 231 patients undergoing same-day pharmacologic rest and stress
resultsThe area-under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC [95% confidence interval]) of stress MBF with MC/RAC was higher for minimal segment (0.89 [0.85-0.94]) than for minimal vessel (0.86 [0.81-0.92], p = 0.03) or global estimation (0.81 [0.75-0.87], p < 0.0001). The AUC of MFR with MC/RAC was higher for minimal segment (0.87 [0.81-0.93]) than for minimal vessel (0.83 [0.76-0.90], p = 0.014) or global estimation (0.77 [0.69-0.84], p < 0.0001). The AUCs of minimal segment stress MBF and MFR with MC/RAC were higher compared to those with no MC/RAC (p < 0.001 for both) or no MC/no RAC (p < 0.0001 for both).
conclusionsMinimal segment MBF or MFR estimation with MC and RAC improves the diagnostic performance for obstructive CAD compared to global assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34967914What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.