Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34967911›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2022

[Increased pulmonary arterial and venous pressure].

Claudius Melzig, Fabian Rengier

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claudius MelzigKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Fabian RengierKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. fabian.rengier@web.de.
University Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreases in pressure in the pulmonary arteries or pulmonary veins may be the result of a variety of underlying diseases. Noninvasive imaging plays a crucial role not only for identification, but also for differential diagnosis.

objectivesThis article provides a comparative review of the signs of increased pulmonary arterial and pulmonary venous pressure in chest X‑ray and computed tomography (CT). RADIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES: Typical signs of a pulmonary arterial or pulmonary venous pressure increase in chest X‑ray and CT facilitate diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension (e.g., enlargement of central pulmonary arteries) and interstitial or alveolar pulmonary edema (e.g., Kerley lines/thickened interlobular septae or butterfly edema). A basic understanding of imaging findings and underlying pathophysiology helps in establishing the differential diagnosis.

conclusionsChest X‑ray and CT are essential for diagnosis of patients with suspected increased pulmonary arterial or pulmonary venous pressure.

Indexed as

Hypertension, PulmonaryPulmonary EdemaHumansLungPulmonary ArteryVenous PressureComputed tomographyImagingPulmonary edemaPulmonary hypertensionRadiography

Identifiers

PMID34967911
OpenAlexW4200387514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.