ReviewDer Radiologe2022
[Clinical update-multiple myeloma].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05860179 (Analyzing Factors of Patient Involvement in Multiple Myeloma Clinical Trials), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Analyzing Factors of Patient Involvement in Multiple Myeloma Clinical Trials
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inflammatory markers from routine blood tests predict survival in multiple myeloma: a Systematic Review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Is RDW a clinically relevant prognostic factor for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma? A systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2022Pooled it
- [Radiological diagnosis of multiple myeloma : Role of imaging and the current S3 guideline].Der Radiologe · 2022Review
- Editorial: Molecular Imaging in Multiple Myeloma: An Update and Future Perspectives.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical issueMultiple myeloma (MM) is a malignancy of hematopoetic system and is associated with destruction of bone, suppressed bone marrow function and renal failure. It is characterized by strong proliferation of malignant plasma cells. STANDARD TREATMENT: Classic therapies contained an alkylating agent and a glucocorticoid. In the 1990s, treatments were supplemented with transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells. TREATMENT INNOVATIONS: During the 2000s, new therapies emerged, combining an immunomodulator (thalidomide, lenalidomide or pomalidomide), a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib, carfilzomib or ixazomib), and a monoclonal antibody against CD38. Currently, antibodies against BCMA (B-cell maturation antigen), bispecific antibodies, and CAR T‑cell (chimeric antigen receptor T cells) therapies are being investigated in clinical trials. DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP: Classic diagnostics were based on end-organ damage, e.g., bone destruction, and estimated tumor load. Since 2014, new criteria for an earlier start of therapy were introduced-concentration of antibody light chains in blood serum, bone marrow lesions and its infiltration by malignant plasma cells. These lesions (clusters of myeloma cells) can be detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Both methods are also used to monitor therapy response. Traditional X‑ray imaging has been replaced by the more gentle, low-dose CT. The standard diagnostic process is extended by cytogenetic examination of bone marrow samples via imaging fluorescent in situ hybridization (iFiSH) to identify patients at high risk. PERFORMANCE: While most MM patients could be treated only palliatively until the 1990s, the prognosis has continuously improved since then. Nowadays, MM can be classified as a chronic disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.