Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34967910›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2022

[Clinical update-multiple myeloma].

Hartmut Goldschmidt

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05860179 (Analyzing Factors of Patient Involvement in Multiple Myeloma Clinical Trials), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05860179 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Analyzing Factors of Patient Involvement in Multiple Myeloma Clinical Trials

TypeobservationalSponsorPower Life Sciences Inc.Ran2024 to 2026Enrolled500ConditionsMultiple Myeloma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hartmut GoldschmidtMedizinische Klinik V, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg und Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT) Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. hartmut.goldschmidt@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
University Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical issueMultiple myeloma (MM) is a malignancy of hematopoetic system and is associated with destruction of bone, suppressed bone marrow function and renal failure. It is characterized by strong proliferation of malignant plasma cells. STANDARD TREATMENT: Classic therapies contained an alkylating agent and a glucocorticoid. In the 1990s, treatments were supplemented with transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells. TREATMENT INNOVATIONS: During the 2000s, new therapies emerged, combining an immunomodulator (thalidomide, lenalidomide or pomalidomide), a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib, carfilzomib or ixazomib), and a monoclonal antibody against CD38. Currently, antibodies against BCMA (B-cell maturation antigen), bispecific antibodies, and CAR T‑cell (chimeric antigen receptor T cells) therapies are being investigated in clinical trials. DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP: Classic diagnostics were based on end-organ damage, e.g., bone destruction, and estimated tumor load. Since 2014, new criteria for an earlier start of therapy were introduced-concentration of antibody light chains in blood serum, bone marrow lesions and its infiltration by malignant plasma cells. These lesions (clusters of myeloma cells) can be detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Both methods are also used to monitor therapy response. Traditional X‑ray imaging has been replaced by the more gentle, low-dose CT. The standard diagnostic process is extended by cytogenetic examination of bone marrow samples via imaging fluorescent in situ hybridization (iFiSH) to identify patients at high risk. PERFORMANCE: While most MM patients could be treated only palliatively until the 1990s, the prognosis has continuously improved since then. Nowadays, MM can be classified as a chronic disease.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaBone MarrowClinical Trials as TopicHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescencePositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPrognosisBone marrowMagnetic resonance imagingMalignant plasma cellsPositron emission tomography/computed tomographyPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID34967910
OpenAlexW4200538180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.