Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34967890›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2022

Detecting Anomalies in Retinal Diseases Using Generative, Discriminative, and Self-supervised Deep Learning.

Philippe Burlina, William Paul, T Y Alvin Liu, Neil M Bressler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Computer vision - ECCV ... : ... European Conference on Computer Vision : proceedings. European Conference on Computer Vision · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Philippe BurlinaApplied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
William PaulApplied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
T Y Alvin LiuDepartment of Computer Science, Malone Center for Engineering in Healthcare, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Neil M BresslerRetina Division, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceAnomaly detectors could be pursued for retinal diagnoses based on artificial intelligence systems that may not have access to training examples for all retinal diseases in all phenotypic presentations. Possible applications could include screening of population for any retinal disease rather than a specific disease such as diabetic retinopathy, detection of novel retinal diseases or novel presentations of common retinal diseases, and detection of rare diseases with little or no data available for training.

objectiveTo study the application of anomaly detection to retinal diseases. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsHigh-resolution retinal images from the publicly available EyePACS data set with fundus images with a corresponding label ranging from 0 to 4 for representing different severities of diabetic retinopathy. Sixteen variants of anomaly detectors were designed. For evaluation, a surrogate problem was constructed, using diabetic retinopathy images, in which only retinas with nonreferable diabetic retinopathy, ie, no diabetic macular edema, and no diabetic retinopathy or mild to moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy were used for training an artificial intelligence system, but both nonreferable and referable diabetic retinopathy (including diabetic macular edema or proliferative diabetic retinopathy) were used to test the system for detecting retinal disease. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Anomaly detectors were evaluated by commonly accepted performance metrics, including area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, F1 score, and accuracy.

resultsA total of 88 692 high-resolution retinal images of 44 346 individuals with varying severity of diabetic retinopathy were analyzed. The best performing across all anomaly detectors had an area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.808 (95% CI, 0.789-0.827) and was obtained using an embedding method that involved a self-supervised network. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study suggests when abnormal (diseased) data, ie, referable diabetic retinopathy in this study, were not available for training of retinal diagnostic systems wherein only nonreferable diabetic retinopathy was used for training, anomaly detection techniques were useful in identifying images with and without referable diabetic retinopathy. This suggests that anomaly detectors may be used to detect retinal diseases in more generalized settings and potentially could play a role in screening of populations for retinal diseases or identifying novel diseases and phenotyping or detecting unusual presentations of common retinal diseases.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiabetic RetinopathyMacular EdemaArtificial IntelligenceFundus OculiHumans

Identifiers

PMID34967890
PMCPMC8719271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.