Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34967880›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Women Oncologists' Perceptions and Factors Associated With Decisions to Pursue Academic vs Nonacademic Careers in Oncology.

Emily C Merfeld, Grace C Blitzer, Aleksandra Kuczmarska-Haas, Susan C Pitt, Fumiko Chino, Trang Le, Wendy A Allen-Rhoades, Suzanne Cole, Ariela L Marshall, Molly Carnes and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Gender Equity Education in Oncology: A Survey Study of Hematology-Oncology Fellowship Program Directors.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Summer Clinical Oncology Research Experience (SCORE) Program: Engaging Undergraduates from Diverse Backgrounds in Cancer Research.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  12. Oncologists' responsibility, comfort, and knowledge managing hyperglycemia in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy: a cross sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Emily C MerfeldDepartment of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison.
Grace C BlitzerDepartment of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison.
Aleksandra Kuczmarska-HaasDepartment of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison.
Susan C PittDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison.
Fumiko ChinoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Trang LeDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison.
Wendy A Allen-RhoadesDepartment of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Suzanne ColeDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Ariela L MarshallDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Molly CarnesDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison.
Reshma JagsiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Narjust DumaDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison.
UW Health University Hospital · USMayo Clinic · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Women outnumber men in US medical school enrollment, but they represent less than 40% of academic oncology faculty. Objective: To identify the key factors associated with female oncologists' decision to pursue academic or nonacademic oncology practice and to characterize their perceptions about their current career. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional survey study was distributed through email and social media to female physicians in academic and nonacademic oncology practice in the United States. The survey was open for 3 months, from August 1 to October 31, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: No single primary study outcome was established because of the cross-sectional nature of the survey. Data were collected anonymously and analyzed using t tests for continuous variables and χ2 tests for categorical variables. Results: Among the 667 female respondents, 422 (63.2%) identified as academic oncologists and 245 (36.8%) identified as nonacademic oncologists. Approximately 25% of respondents reported that their spouse or partner (156 [23.5%]) and/or family (176 [26.4%]) extremely or moderately affected their decision to pursue academic practice. Academic oncologists perceived the biggest sacrifice of pursuing academics to be time with loved ones (181 [42.9%]). Nonacademic oncologists perceived the biggest sacrifice of pursuing academics to be pressure for academic promotion (102 [41.6%]). Respondents had different perceptions of how their gender affected their ability to obtain a chosen job, with 116 academic oncologists (27.6%) and 101 nonacademic oncologists (41.2%) reporting a positive or somewhat positive impact (P = .001). More than half of the women surveyed (54.6% academic oncologists [230]; 50.6% nonacademic oncologists [123]; P = .61) believed they were less likely to be promoted compared with male colleagues. Academic and nonacademic oncologists reported rarely or never having a sense of belonging in their work environment (33 [7.9%] and 5 [2.0%]; P < .001). Most respondents reported that they would choose the same career path again (301 academic oncologists [71.3%]; 168 nonacademic oncologists [68.6%]); however, 92 academic oncologists (21.9%) reported they were likely to pursue a career outside of academic oncology in the next 5 years. Conclusions and Relevance: This survey study found that a spouse or partner and/or family were factors in the career choice of both academic and nonacademic oncologists and that female gender was largely perceived to adversely affect job promotion. Given that more than 20% of female academic oncologists were considering leaving academia, gender inequality is at high risk of continuing if the culture is not addressed.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCareer ChoiceOncologistsPhysicians, WomenAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID34967880
PMCPMC8719237
OpenAlexW4200544551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.