ArticleJAMA network open2021
Association of Physician Characteristics With Early Adoption of Virtual Health Care.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physician adoption patterns of AI-driven clinical decision support systems in urinary tract infection management.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Perceptions, barriers, and facilitators of telemedicine adoption among physicians in Palestinian primary care: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- The role of patient, clinician, and neighborhood characteristics in predicting telemedicine engagement and modality in primary care: a cross-sectional analysis.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Acceptance and Utilization of Real-World Evidence among Cancer Care Physicians in the USA: A National Survey.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2025Article
- Use, knowledge and perception of large language models in clinical practice: a cross-sectional mixed-methods survey among clinicians in Switzerland.BMJ health & care informatics · 2025Article
- Using Theory-Based Frameworks to Identify Barriers and Enablers of Physicians' Telemedicine Adoption and Develop Intervention Strategies in China: Multicenter Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Early Impressions and Adoption of the AtriAmp for Managing Arrhythmias Following Congenital Heart Surgery.Pediatric cardiology · 2025Article
- The Carbon Footprint of In-person Versus Virtual Orthopaedic Care.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025Article
- Provider Adoption of an Online Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder eHealth Care Application.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Factors Influencing Primary Care Physicians' Intent to Refer Patients With Hypertension to a Digital Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring Program: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Strategies for Overcoming Barriers in Access to Cardiovascular Care for Women.Circulation research · 2025Review
- Clinical decision making and risk appraisal using electronic risk assessment tools for cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study of GP experiences.BJGP open · 2025Article
- A Systematic Review of New Imaging Technologies for Robotic Prostatectomy: From Molecular Imaging to Augmented Reality.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Investigating Factors Influencing Medical Practitioners' Resistance to and Adoption of Internet Hospitals in China: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Quality Frameworks for Virtual Care: Expert Panel Recommendations.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2023Article
- Review
- Article
- An Overview of Telehealth in the Management of Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2022Review
- Real-world intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) use in percutaneous intervention-naïve patients is determined predominantly by operator, patient, and lesion characteristics.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The rapid transition to virtual health care has depended on physician and patient abilities to adopt new technology and workflows. Physicians transitioning more slowly or not at all could result in access challenges for their patients. Objective: To identify physician characteristics associated with the transition to virtual health care in a large regional health care system. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cross-sectional study uses administrative health system databases to analyze data from all 3473 physicians providing ambulatory care through a large New England health care system, which includes 12 hospitals and their ambulatory practices, from October 1, 2019, through December 31, 2020. Exposures: Physicians characterized based on gender, popularized generational demographic cohort (Silent Generation, born 1928-1945; Baby Boomers, born 1946-1964; Generation X, born 1965-1980; and Millennials, born 1981-1996), specialty (behavioral health, primary care, medical, and surgical), and hospital affiliation as well as selected patient characteristics (number of visits and proportion of patients with self-pay or Medicaid insurance, aged 65 years or older, preference for speaking a language other than English, from a racial or ethnic minority group, and with an active patient portal). Main Outcomes and Measures: Early adoption of virtual health care. Bivariate comparisons were made, and regression modeling was used to examine characteristics associated with the likelihood of early adoption of virtual health care. Results: Of 3473 physicians conducting ambulatory visits during the study period, 1624 (46.8%) were women, 83 (2.4%) were in the Silent Generation, 994 (28.6%) were Baby Boomers, 1637 (47.1%) were in Generation X, and 759 (21.9%) were Millennials. There were 1649 physicians (47.5%) in medical specialties, 749 physicians (21.6%) in surgical specialties, and 248 physicians (7.1%) in behavioral health. After accounting for other characteristics, female (odds ratio [OR], 1.23; 95% CI, 1.06-1.44), behavioral health (OR, 2.92; 95% CI, 2.11-4.04), and primary care (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.36-2.09) physicians had greater odds of being early adopters, and physicians in the Silent Generation (OR, 0.39, 95% CI, 0.24-0.65) and in surgical specialties (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.38-0.57) were less likely to be early adopters. Patient characteristics were less strongly associated with physician adoption. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, there was physician-level variation in the adoption of virtual health care, with female, primary care, and behavioral health physicians in this system most likely to lead the transformation to virtual health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.