Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34967827›Full record

ArticleNursing research

Adaptation of Metabolomics and Microbiomic Research Protocols During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Brittany Butts, Taqiyya Alford, Glenna Brewster, Nicole Carlson, Ebony Coleman, Erica Davis, Erin Ferranti, Laura P Kimble, Laren Narapareddy, Jessica Wells and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Apple (Israel) · IL

Funding

Implementing a Maternal health and PRegnancy Outcomes Vision for Everyone (IMPROVE)UL1TR002378 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Andres J Garcia, Elizabeth O. Ofili · 2017 to 2026
$92.1M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002381 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HENRY M BLUMBERG, Anandi Nayan Sheth · 2017 to 2026
$14.1M
Neuro HPA Project 1U54AG062334 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Cecile Delille Lahiri, Vasiliki Michopoulos · 2018 to 2026
$12.2M
Pilot Administrative Core - Center for the Study of Symptom Science, Metabolomics and Multiple Chronic ConditionsP30NR018090 · NINR · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DUNBAR, SANDRA B. · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
Using design thinking approaches to tailor a dyadic behavioral sleep intervention for persons living with dementia and their caregiversK23AG070378 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BREWSTER, GLENNA SHEMIDA · 2021 to 2025
$992k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002381NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002378NIA NIH HHS K23 AG070378NIA NIH HHS U54 AG062334NINR NIH HHS P30 NR018090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen the COVID-19 pandemic hit in 2020, researchers in the P30 Center for the Study of Symptom Science, Metabolomics, and Multiple Chronic Conditions at Emory University's Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing faced major challenges in recruitment and data collection because of limited access to the clinic and community facilities and the risk of COVID-19 exposure associated with in-person study contact.

objectivesThe purpose of this article is to (a) describe how a cadre of pilot/supplement principal investigators adapted their studies to allow for safe and trustworthy data collection during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020 through date of publication) and (b) discuss steps that facilitated the technical aspects of remote data collection, especially involving biological specimens.

resultsFour pilot studies and two administrative supplements within the center-all at different stages of execution-adopted various alternative remote recruitment, enrollment, and data and specimen collection approaches to continue their research endeavors in a way that maximized the safety of both the research participants and the research teams. DISCUSSION: The article concludes with a discussion on the importance of a participant-centered approach when using remote methods, actions, or steps initiated to facilitate the technical aspects of remote data collection and reflections on the continued use of remote research strategies beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansMetabolomicsPandemicsResearch DesignSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34967827
PMCPMC8881317
OpenAlexW4200242274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.