ArticleBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2022
Characterising differences in red blood cell usage patterns between healthcare sectors in South Africa: 2014-2019.
Article in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The prevalence of hepatitis B virus, human T-lymphotropic virus and human immunodeficiency virus in patients receiving blood transfusions in South Africa.Vox sanguinis · 2024Article
- Blood banking in South Africa.Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSouth Africa aims to transition from a two-tiered healthcare system (public and private) to universal health coverage. Data on red blood cell (RBC) product usage reveal disparities between the sectors. Blood transfusion services further need to understand differing disease profiles and transfusion prescribing practices between the sectors to ensure blood security should the transition to a two-tiered health system come to fruition. MATERIALS AND
methodsOperational data for public and private healthcare RBC requests between 1 January 2014 and 31 March 2019, obtained from the South African National Blood Service (SANBS), were retrospectively analysed. Sector-specific demographic and utilisation trends were compared for the dominant clinical disciplines. Pre-transfusion haemoglobin (Hb) patterns were also delineated for 2018.
resultsBetween 2014 and 2019, 2,356,411 public and private sector RBC transfusion events resulted in the issue of 4,020,094 RBC units (1,553,159 transfusion events and 2,495,054 units within the public sector versus 803,282 transfusion events and 1,525,040 units in private). The dominant clinical disciplines within the public sector were Medical (32.9%), Gynaecology/Obstetrics (27.3%), General Surgery (13.6%), and Paediatrics (including Paediatric Surgery) (6.5%), compared to Intensive Care Units (33.2%), Medical (28.3%), General Surgery (10.4%), and Haematology/Oncology (8.3%) in the private sector. Median pre-transfusion Hb values for 2018 were lower in the public than in the private sector: 6.9 g/dL public sector versus 8 g/dL private sector. DISCUSSION: Clinical drivers of RBC usage within the public and private healthcare sectors in South Africa differ significantly. Disparate pre-transfusion Hb between the sectors are likely due to differing disease profiles and severity, as well as differences in practice in prescribing transfusions. Implementation of a nationally co-ordinated Patient Blood Management programme may help to address these disparities and help ensure a sustainable blood transfusion system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.