Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34967566›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2021

Target Volume Delineation Training in Radiation Oncology in India : A Survey Evaluating Its Status, the Need for Educational Programs and the Utility of Virtual Teaching.

Syed Touseef Ahmed Hussain, Pragna Sagar Rapole, Pooja Sethi, Aswin Chandran Veluthattil, Ninad Patil, Chandramouli Ramalingam, Mahalakshmy Thulasingam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Syed Touseef Ahmed HussainDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Jawaharlal Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.
Pragna Sagar RapoleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Jawaharlal Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.
Pooja SethiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Jawaharlal Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.
Aswin Chandran VeluthattilDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Jawaharlal Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.
Ninad PatilDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Jawaharlal Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.
Chandramouli RamalingamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Jawaharlal Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.
Mahalakshmy ThulasingamDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, D Nagar JIPMER, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8326-2855

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe complexity of modern-day radiotherapy techniques calls for greater accuracy in target volume delineation which requires intensive training and expert guidance. In this study, we intend to evaluate the status of training in target delineation across radiation oncology curriculums in India and utility of webinars in teaching it. METHODOLOGY: We organized daily webinars on the topics of radiological anatomy and target volume delineation in common sites of cancer over a period of 2 weeks. At the end of the program, a 35 item survey questionnaire was shared with the participants. The responses were analysed and are reported here.

resultsOut of the 797 participants that registered for the course, 356 radiation oncologists responded to the survey questionnaire. Majority (96%) of our respondents believe that there is a need for additional training in target volume delineation. Ninety percent of the participants felt that radiation oncology curriculum requires a formal radiology training but only 6.7% reported that their training consisted of a dedicated rotation and regular lectures in radiological anatomy. Majority (97%) responded that they were  likely to incorporate the points learnt from the webinar sessions in their daily practice. Forty eight percent of respondents opted for attending a webinar to an in-person event in the future while 34% would like to have the option to choose between the two. Ninety four percent agreed that online webinars should be conducted routinely even after the pandemic ends.

conclusionOur survey results suggest that target volume delineation training in India is deficient and virtual teaching programs can be a practical and effective way to improve it.

Indexed as

AdultCurriculumEducation, DistanceEducation, Medical, ContinuingFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedNeeds AssessmentRadiation OncologySurveys and QuestionnairesEducationtarget volume delineationVirtual teachingWebinar

Identifiers

PMID34967566
PMCPMC9080364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.