Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34967423›Full record

ArticleUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2022

Are there factors in the disease of peroneal necrotizing fasciitis which should be used when choosing the anesthetic technique?: Descriptive analysis of a cohort from two centers.

Ömer Faruk Boran, Bülent Katı, Veli Fahri Pehlivan, Maruf Boran, Evren Büyükfırat, Mehmet Buğra Bozan, Osman Barut, Mehmet Kutlu Demirkol, Halil Çiftçi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ömer Faruk BoranDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Faculty of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş-Turkey.
Bülent KatıDepartment of Urology, Harran University Faculty of Medicine, Şanlıurfa-Turkey.
Veli Fahri PehlivanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Harran University Faculty of Medicine, Şanlıurfa-Turkey.
Maruf BoranDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Amasya Şerefeddin Sabuncuoğlu Training and Research Hospital, Amasya-Turkey.
Evren BüyükfıratDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Harran University Faculty of Medicine, Şanlıurfa-Turkey.
Mehmet Buğra BozanDepartment of General Surgery, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Faculty of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş-Turkey.
Osman BarutDepartment of Urology, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Faculty of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş-Turkey.
Mehmet Kutlu DemirkolDepartment of Urology, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Faculty of Medicine, Kahramanmaraş-Turkey.
Halil ÇiftçiDepartment of Urology, Harran University Faculty of Medicine, Şanlıurfa-Turkey.
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aims to examine the factors affecting the selection of anaesthesia method in Fournier's gangrene.

methodsA retrospective evaluation was made of 113 patients operated on because of Fournier's gangrene between January-May 2019. The operations were performed under spinal anaesthesia in 78 cases (Group S) and under general anaesthesia in 35 cases (Group G). The patients were evaluated regarding age, gender, the anaesthesia method used (spinal, general) anaesthetic agent applied, presence of sepsis, and biochemical, hematological and inflammatory parameters.

resultsWhen the patients were evaluated regarding the Fournier Gangrene Severity Index (FGSI), patients in Group S had lower scores (p=0.001). Examination of the tomography images revealed that in 13 (37.1%) patients, air values were seen in the right or left gluteal area, or both, extending to the subcutaneous tissue. In the evaluation of the factors affecting the selection of general anaesthesia, a positive correlation was determined between an increase in FGSI (r=0.482, p=0.001) and the presence of sepsis (r=0.485, p=0.001) and gluteal region involvement (r=0.628, p<0.001).

conclusionThe selection of anaesthesia method in Fournier gangrene patients is a complex process affected by factors, such as the patients' general condition, sepsis, and whether or not there is bleeding diathesis. The risk -benefit balance in the selection of anaesthesia method should be evaluated individually for patients.

Indexed as

AnestheticsFasciitis, NecrotizingFournier GangreneHumansRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexAnesthetics

Identifiers

PMID34967423
PMCPMC10443158
OpenAlexW3025792908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.