Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34966977›Full record

ArticleBrain imaging and behavior2022

Five weeks of intermittent transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation shape neural networks: a machine learning approach.

Martina A Obst, Arkan Al-Zubaidi, Marcus Heldmann, Janis Marc Nolde, Nick Blümel, Swantje Kannenberg, Thomas F Münte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain imaging and behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Long-term effects of vagus nerve stimulation therapy on cognitive functioning in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Martina A ObstDepartment of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Arkan Al-ZubaidiApplied Neurocognitive Psychology Lab, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Marcus HeldmannDepartment of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Janis Marc NoldeUniversity of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Nick BlümelDepartment of Internal Medicine 1, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Swantje KannenbergDepartment of Internal Medicine 1, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Thomas F MünteDepartment of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany. thomas.muente@neuro.uni-luebeck.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9843-2124

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft MU1311/20; MU1311/16; TR134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive and transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation [(t)-VNS] have been used to treat epilepsy, depression and migraine and has also shown effects on metabolism and body weight. To what extent this treatment shapes neural networks and how such network changes might be related to treatment effects is currently unclear. Using a pre-post mixed study design, we applied either a tVNS or sham stimulation (5 h/week) in 34 overweight male participants in the context of a study designed to assess effects of tVNS on body weight and metabolic and cognitive parameters resting state (rs) fMRI was measured about 12 h after the last stimulation period. Support vector machine (SVM) classification was applied to fractional amplitude low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF) on established rs-networks. All classification results were controlled for random effects and overfitting. Finally, we calculated multiple regressions between the classification results and reported food craving. We found a classification accuracy (CA) of 79 % in a subset of four brainstem regions suggesting that tVNS leads to lasting changes in brain networks. Five of eight salience network regions yielded 76,5 % CA. Our study shows tVNS' post-stimulation effects on fALFF in the salience rs-network. More detailed investigations of this effect and their relationship with food intake seem reasonable for future studies.

Indexed as

Vagus Nerve StimulationBody WeightHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural Networks, ComputerfALFFHumanInteroceptionMachine learning classificationObesityRewardrs- fMRISaliencytVNS

Identifiers

PMID34966977
PMCPMC9107416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.