ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2021
Complexes of Li, Na, and Mg with 2D allotropies of second and third period: a theoretical study.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Complexes of Li, Na, and Mg with graphene, silicene, phosphorene nanoflakes (NFs), and their 2D allotropies have been studied at dispersion corrected TPSS/def-TZVP level of theory. The energy partition analysis of the complexes revealed that for most of the complexes exchange and correlation energies represent dominant contributions to the binding with strong charge transfer from the metal atom to a NF. The exceptions are Mg complexes of graphene and phosphorene NFs where binding is due to dispersion and correlation terms. This difference is also reflected in large Mg-NF distances suggesting weak intermolecular interactions in these complexes. The calculated activation energies for metal hopping are easily achievable at room temperatures for carbon and silicon allotropies. However, they are significantly higher for phosphorus allotropies reaching almost 18 kcal/mol. Generally, activation energies for hopping increase with binding energies for graphene, silicene, and phosphorene NFs. This trend does not observe however for graphene, silicene, and phosphorene 2D allotropies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34966959What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.