Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34966930›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2022

A scoping review of the use of e-learning and e-consultation for healthcare workers in low- and middle-income countries and their potential complementarity.

Alma Ionescu, Peter G M de Jong, Stenvert L S Drop, Sanne C van Kampen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. E-learning Challenges among Healthcare Students: A Scoping Review.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2026
    Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The Global Health Informatics landscape and JAMIA.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Review
  10. Learning Design Strategies in MOOCs for Physicians' Training: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alma IonescuDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Peter G M de JongCenter for Innovation in Medical Education, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Stenvert L S DropDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1668-262X
Sanne C van KampenDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough the provision of e-learning (EL) training for healthcare workers (HCWs) and provider-to-HCW e-consultation (EC) is considered useful for health outcomes, research on their joint use is limited. This scoping review aimed to create an overview of what is currently known in the literature about the use and implementation of EC and EL by HCWs in LMICs and to answer the question of whether there is evidence of complementarity. MATERIALS AND

methodsScientific databases were searched and peer-reviewed papers were reviewed systematically according to predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data were extracted including the study focus (EC/EL), year of publication, geographical location, target population, target disease(s) under study, type(s) of study outcomes, and article type.

resultsA total of 3051 articles were retrieved and screened for eligibility, of which 96 were kept for analysis. Of these, only 3 addressed both EL and EC; 54 studies addressed EL; and 39 addressed EC. Most studies looked at gain in knowledge/skills usability, efficiency, competence, and satisfaction of HCW, or barriers/challenges to implementation. Descriptive studies focused on the application of EL or EC for targeting specific health conditions. Factors contributing to the success of EC or EL networks were institutional anchoring, multiple partnership, and capacity building of local experts.

conclusionsOur review found an important gap in the literature in relation to the complementary role of EL and EC for HCWs in LMICs evidenced by outcome measures. There is an important role for national and international academic institutions, learned medical societies, and networks to support regional experts in providing EL and EC for added value that will help the clinical performance of HCWs and improve health outcomes.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionDeveloping CountriesDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansReferral and Consultatione-consultatione-learningglobal healthhealthcare workerlow-to-middle-income countriesresource-limited countriestelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34966930
PMCPMC8922198
OpenAlexW4205683056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.