ArticleAEM education and training2021
Systematic online academic resource (SOAR) review: Endocrine, metabolic, and nutritional disorders.
Article in AEM education and training, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers and Enablers to the Production of Open Access Medical Education Platforms: Scoping Review.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- FOAM authorship: Who's teaching our learners?AEM education and training · 2024Article
- SAEM systematic online academic resource (SOAR) review: Gastrointestinal illnesses.AEM education and training · 2024Article
- Systematic online academic resource (SOAR) review: Pediatric respiratory infectious disease.AEM education and training · 2024Article
- Systematic online academic resources (SOAR) review: Sickle cell disorders.AEM education and training · 2022Article
- Small bowel carcinoid tumor causing intestinal ischemia: A case report with review of the literature.Radiology case reports · 2022Article
- Erratum: Re: Systematic online academic resource (SOAR) review: Endocrine, metabolic, and nutritional disorders.AEM education and training · 2022Article
- Systematic online academic resource (SOAR) review: Endocrine, metabolic, and nutritional disorders.AEM education and training · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFree open-access medical education (FOAM) has become an integral resource for medical school and residency education. However, questions of quality and inconsistent coverage of core topics remain. In this second entry of the SAEM Systematic Online Academic Resource (SOAR) series, we describe the application of a systematic methodology to identify, curate, and describe FOAM topics specific to endocrine, metabolic, and nutritional disorders as defined by the 2016 Model of the Clinical Practice of Emergency Medicine (MCPEM).
methodsWe developed an automated algorithm to search 264 keywords derived from nine subtopics within the MCPEM category in the FOAM Search (a customized FOAM search tool) and the Social Media index. The top 100 results were extracted for each keyword. Resources underwent a manual iterative screening process, and those relevant to endocrine, metabolic, or nutritional disorders and EM were evaluated with the revised Medical Education Translational Resources: Impact and Quality (rMETRIQ) tool.
resultsThe search yielded 36,346 resources, of which 756 met the criteria for quality assessment. After rMETRIQ tool training, four raters demonstrated an average measured intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.94 (95% confidence interval = 0.88 to 0.97,
conclusionsWe systematically identified, described, and curated FOAM resources for EM learners on the topic of endocrine, metabolic, and nutritional disorders. A final list of high-quality resources can guide trainees, educator recommendations, and FOAM authors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.