ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2021
A Dutch Cross-sectional Population Survey to Explore Satisfaction of Women with their Breasts.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bilateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomy With Immediate Breast Reconstruction Lowers Concerns of Breast Cancer in Women With a High-Risk Genetic Predisposition for Breast Cancer Compared With a Radiological Imaging Surveillance Group.Journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Anthropometric estimates can predict satisfaction with breast in a population of asymptomatic women.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Article
- Swedish Normative Scores for the BREAST-Q Reduction/Mastopexy Module.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLittle is known about how satisfied women are with their breasts and which factors influence breast satisfaction. Therefore, the aim of this study was to elucidate this by collecting data on breast satisfaction from the general population in relation to age, body mass index, lifestyle, psychological, and physical well-being.
methodThis study was a cross-sectional population survey performed in 2019 in the north of the Netherlands, among randomly selected women between 20 and 80 years. Breast satisfaction was measured in the 1334 participants with the preoperative reconstruction BREAST-Q module. Other applied questionnaires were the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Short Form Survey (SF-36), and a custom-made questionnaire on lifestyle and baseline characteristics. Representativeness was assessed by comparing the participants with Dutch normative data. Possible factors influencing "satisfaction with breasts" were analyzed using multivariate linear regression analyses.
resultsThe median (IQR) BREAST-Q score for "satisfaction with breasts" was mediocre: 63 (58-79) on a 0-100 scale. Higher age and higher SF-36 scores had a positive effect on breast satisfaction (
conclusionThese data are the first European normative data and can serve as a reference in future population and patient-based studies regarding breast satisfaction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.