ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2021
Foot Wounds and the Reconstructive Ladder.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Successful Limb Salvage Using Staged Applications of a Fish-Skin Xenograft (Kerecis) in a Heel Pad Degloving Injury: A Case Report.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Proximal Humerus Ewing Sarcoma: Technical Challenges and Strategies for Bone Defect Reconstruction.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Soft tissue reconstruction of the foot after mine-explosion injury: a case report.Case reports in plastic surgery & hand surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Practical Review of the Current Management of Frostbite Injuries.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFoot soft tissue coverage represents a challenge to reconstructive surgeons due to a lack of donor sites for this specialized skin. This glabrous tethered thick skin is designed to withstand weight bearing stress and is hard to replace. The limited arch of rotation of foot local flaps contributes to further difficulties. In this study, we share our experience in foot soft tissue loss coverage using techniques tailored to each wound presentation.
methodsThis case series presents eight patients with wounds of the plantar and dorsal surfaces of the foot, heel, and ankle. Closure techniques were selected and planned based on wound presentation and comorbidity status.
resultsPatients' mean age at surgery was 61 years. Etiologies of wounds include trauma, frostbite, diabetic ulceration, malignancy, pressure ulcer with osteomyelitis, and necrotizing infection. Coverage techniques included split and full-thickness skin graft, medial plantar arch pinch graft, cultured epithelial autograft, Hyalomatrix wound device, EpiFix tissue matrix, pedicle flap, and free rectus flap. Complete soft tissue coverage was achieved in each case within reasonable postoperative periods, and ambulation was preserved and/or restored.
conclusionsFoot soft tissue reconstruction is challenging and should be planned carefully due to the required specialized skin replacement. Primary closure should be considered first and attempted if possible. Technique escalation in accordance with the reconstructive ladder should be undertaken based on wound etiology, presentation, amount and nature of tissue loss, available resources, and surgeon experience.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.