Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34966621›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

The Efficacy of Hemostatic Radiotherapy for Advanced Malignancies Assessed by World Health Organization Bleeding Status.

Atsuto Katano, Hideomi Yamashita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Radiotherapy as an antihemorrhagic approach in gastric cancer: the RANTIGA study.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  2. Hemostatic palliative radiotherapy for gastric cancer: A literature review.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2024
    Review
  3. Hemostatic radiotherapy for bleeding gastrointestinal tumors.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Atsuto KatanoRadiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, JPN.
Hideomi YamashitaRadiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose  This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of radiotherapy for the palliation of bleeding symptoms of advanced malignancies. Patients and methods We included 36 consecutive patients treated for hemostatic intent by radiotherapy at our institution, from August 2013 to January 2019. Patient bleeding status was assessed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) bleeding status before and after radiotherapy. Results We identified 36 consecutive patients, consisting of 14 men and 22 women. The median follow-up period after radiotherapy for all cases was 2.5 months (range: 0.4-37.7 months), and the one-year OS was 47.1% (95% confidence interval: 23.5%-67.6%). Of the 36 patients, 29 (81%) showed improvement by one point or more in the WHO bleeding status. A total of 15 patients received 30 Gy in 10 fractions with a biologically effective dose (BED10) of 39 Gy (high BED arm). The remaining 21 patients had received radiotherapy with a BED10 of less than 39 (low BED arm, range of BED10: 11.2-30 Gy). In the high BED arm, 14 of the 15 patients (91%) showed improvement on the WHO bleeding status. In the low BED arm, 15 of the 21 patients (71%) showed improvement on the WHO bleeding status. There was no statistically significant difference in the improvement rate between the high and low BED arms (p = 0.200). Conclusion There is no universal standard to evaluate the hemostatic effect of palliative radiotherapy. In this retrospective study, we investigated the clinical outcomes of hemostatic irradiation as assessed by WHO bleeding status.

Indexed as

bleedinghemostaticpalliative careradiation therapyretrospective analysis

Identifiers

PMID34966621
PMCPMC8711259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.