ArticleCureus2021
The Efficacy of Hemostatic Radiotherapy for Advanced Malignancies Assessed by World Health Organization Bleeding Status.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiotherapy as an antihemorrhagic approach in gastric cancer: the RANTIGA study.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Article
- Hemostatic palliative radiotherapy for gastric cancer: A literature review.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2024Review
- Hemostatic radiotherapy for bleeding gastrointestinal tumors.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Hemostatic radiotherapy in clinically significant tumor-related bleeding: excellent palliative results in a retrospective analysis of 77 patients.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of radiotherapy for the palliation of bleeding symptoms of advanced malignancies. Patients and methods We included 36 consecutive patients treated for hemostatic intent by radiotherapy at our institution, from August 2013 to January 2019. Patient bleeding status was assessed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) bleeding status before and after radiotherapy. Results We identified 36 consecutive patients, consisting of 14 men and 22 women. The median follow-up period after radiotherapy for all cases was 2.5 months (range: 0.4-37.7 months), and the one-year OS was 47.1% (95% confidence interval: 23.5%-67.6%). Of the 36 patients, 29 (81%) showed improvement by one point or more in the WHO bleeding status. A total of 15 patients received 30 Gy in 10 fractions with a biologically effective dose (BED10) of 39 Gy (high BED arm). The remaining 21 patients had received radiotherapy with a BED10 of less than 39 (low BED arm, range of BED10: 11.2-30 Gy). In the high BED arm, 14 of the 15 patients (91%) showed improvement on the WHO bleeding status. In the low BED arm, 15 of the 21 patients (71%) showed improvement on the WHO bleeding status. There was no statistically significant difference in the improvement rate between the high and low BED arms (p = 0.200). Conclusion There is no universal standard to evaluate the hemostatic effect of palliative radiotherapy. In this retrospective study, we investigated the clinical outcomes of hemostatic irradiation as assessed by WHO bleeding status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.