Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34966570›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2021

Frequent, quantitative bone planar scintigraphy for determination of bone anabolism in growing mice.

Ariane Zaloszyc, Claus Peter Schmitt, Amira Sayeh, Laetitia Higel, Catherine-Isabelle Gros, Fabien Bornert, Gaëlle Aubertin-Kirch, Jean-Philippe Dillenseger, Christian Goetz, André Constantinesco and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Temporal evolution of postsurgical bone repair in a rabbit model: A [99mTc]Tc-MDP scintigraphic study.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ariane Zaloszyc *Service de Pédiatrie 1, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Claus Peter Schmitt *Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Pediatric Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Amira SayehImagerie Préclinique-UF6237, Pôle d'imagerie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Laetitia HigelService de Pédiatrie 1, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Catherine-Isabelle GrosPôle de Médecine et Chirurgie Bucco-dentaires, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Fabien BornertPôle de Médecine et Chirurgie Bucco-dentaires, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Gaëlle Aubertin-KirchImagerie Préclinique-UF6237, Pôle d'imagerie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Jean-Philippe DillensegerImagerie Préclinique-UF6237, Pôle d'imagerie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Christian GoetzDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Klinik für Nuklear Medizin, Freiburg, Germany.
André ConstantinescoImagerie Préclinique-UF6237, Pôle d'imagerie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Michel FischbachService de Pédiatrie 1, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Seiamak BahramFédération Hospitalo-Universitaire, OMICARE, Centre de Recherche d'Immunologie et d'Hématologie, Strasbourg, France.
Philippe ChoquetImagerie Préclinique-UF6237, Pôle d'imagerie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg · FRUniversité de Strasbourg · FRHeidelberg University · DEInserm · FRUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo provide insight into bone turnover, quantitative measurements of bone remodeling are required. Radionuclide studies are widely used in clinical care, but have been rarely used in the exploration of the bone in preclinical studies. We describe a bone planar scintigraphy method for frequent assessment of bone activity in mice across the growing period. Since repeated venous radiotracer injections are hardly feasible in mice, we investigated the subcutaneous route.

methodsRepeated

resultsA total of 93 scintigraphy studies and 85 µCT were performed. Repeated subcutaneous tracer injections were well tolerated and allowed for adequate radionuclide studies. Mean scintigraphic indexes in the knees ROI decreased from 87.4 ± 2.6 × 10

conclusionThis methodological study demonstrates the potential of repeated bone planar scintigraphy in growing mice, with subcutaneous route for tracer administration, for quantitative assessment of bone remodeling.

Indexed as

GrowthMiceRadionuclide imagingSubcutaneous application

Identifiers

PMID34966570
PMCPMC8667748
OpenAlexW4226059207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.