SynthesisJournal of healthcare engineering2021
Comparison of Clinical Features and Inflammatory Markers between Kawasaki Disease Shock Syndrome and Kawasaki Disease without Shock: A Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel scoring system based on sIL-2R for predicting IVIG resistance in Chinese children with KD.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2024Article
- Risk factors and an early predictive model for Kawasaki disease shock syndrome in Chinese children.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- An early predictive model for Kawasaki disease shock syndrome in children in central China.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Retracted: Comparison of Clinical Features and Inflammatory Markers between Kawasaki Disease Shock Syndrome and Kawasaki Disease without Shock: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-10-04Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/B9EBF693F7A1341072F8CCCD17D5DE
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the shock is not a common symptom of KD, it is often misdiagnosed at the beginning of the pathogenesis of KDSS. The language searched was only Chinese and English. Data from the articles were screened and extracted for meta-analysis using Stata16.0 software. A total of 9 cohort studies, including 1231 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. The results of meta-analysis showed that the age of the children in the KDSS group was higher than that in the KD group without shock, and the difference was statistically significant (SMD = 1.15, 95% CI (0.52, 1.78),
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.