Trial reportAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges2022
The Effects of Leadership Curricula With and Without Implicit Bias Training on Graduate Medical Education: A Multicenter Randomized Trial.
Trial report in Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Leadership Education for Doctors-A Scoping Review.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2026Review
- Female Leadership in Emergency Medicine: A Narrative Review (1999-2024).Journal of healthcare leadership · 2026Review
- Determining the Effectiveness of a Clinical Nursing Teaching Intervention in Improving Teamwork Ability: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Article
- Leadership training in emergency medicine: A national survey.AEM education and training · 2024Article
- Closing the gender gap in medicine: the impact of a simulation-based confidence and negotiation course for women in graduate medical education.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Leadership Experiences of Internal Medicine Residents: A Needs Assessment for Leadership Curricula.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2022Article
- Form for planning and elaborating high fidelity simulation scenarios: A validation study.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo determine whether a brief leadership curriculum including high-fidelity simulation can improve leadership skills among resident physicians.
methodThis was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial among obstetrics-gynecology and emergency medicine (EM) residents across 5 academic medical centers from different geographic areas of the United States, 2015-2017. Participants were assigned to 1 of 3 study arms: the Leadership Education Advanced During Simulation (LEADS) curriculum, a shortened Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) curriculum, or as active controls (no leadership curriculum). Active controls were recruited from a separate site and not randomized to limit any unintentional introduction of materials from leadership curricula. The LEADS curriculum was developed in partnership with the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology and Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine as a novel way to provide a leadership toolkit. Both LEADS and the abbreviated TeamSTEPPS were designed as six 10-minute interactive web-based modules.The primary outcome of interest was the leadership performance score from the validated Clinical Teamwork Scale instrument measured during standardized high-fidelity simulation scenarios. Secondary outcomes were 9 key components of leadership from the detailed leadership evaluation measured on 5-point Likert scales. Both outcomes were rated by a blinded clinical video reviewer.
resultsOne hundred ten obstetrics-gynecology and EM residents participated in this 2-year trial. Participants in both LEADS and TeamSTEPPS had statistically significant improvement in leadership scores from "average" to "good" ranges both immediately and at the 6-month follow-up, while controls remained unchanged in the "average" category throughout the study. There were no differences between LEADS and TeamSTEPPS curricula with respect to the primary outcome.
conclusionsResidents who participated in a brief structured leadership training intervention had improved leadership skills that were maintained at 6-month follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.