Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34965975›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022

Differential Effects of Endogenous and Exogenous Attention on Sensory Tuning.

Antonio Fernández, Sara Okun, Marisa Carrasco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The puzzle of profitless pre-cues.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Emergent neuronal mechanisms mediating covert attention in convolutional neural networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Exogenous Spatial Attention Helps Overcome Spatial Specificity of Visual Learning in the Blind Field After V1 Damage.Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice · 2025
    Article
  14. Attention Rhythmically Shapes Sensory Tuning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A computational account of transsaccadic attentional allocation based on visual gain fields.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Featural Representation and Internal Noise Underlie the Eccentricity Effect in Contrast Sensitivity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Antonio FernándezDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York 10003 antonio.fernandez@nyu.edu.
Sara OkunDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York 10003.
Marisa CarrascoDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York 10003.

Funding

Temporal Dynamics of Visual Perception and AttentionR01EY019693 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CARRASCO, MARISA · 2010 to 2022
$4.0M
Linking brain and behavior 'around' the visual fieldR01EY027401 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CARRASCO, MARISA, WINAWER, JONATHAN A · 2017 to 2025
$2.9M
How does covert attention modulate visual perception? Psychophysics, neurostimulation and neuroimagingF99NS120705 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI FERNANDEZ, ANTONIO · 2021 to 2022
$73k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019693NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027401NINDS NIH HHS F99 NS120705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Covert spatial attention (without concurrent eye movements) improves performance in many visual tasks (e.g., orientation discrimination and visual search). However, both covert attention systems-endogenous (voluntary) and exogenous (involuntary)-exhibit differential effects on performance in tasks mediated by spatial and temporal resolution suggesting an underlying mechanistic difference. We investigated whether these differences manifest in sensory tuning by assessing whether and how endogenous and exogenous attention differentially alter the representation of two basic visual dimensions-orientation and spatial frequency (SF). The same human observers detected a grating embedded in noise in two separate experiments (with endogenous or exogenous attention cues). Reverse correlation was used to infer the underlying neural representation from behavioral responses, and we linked our results to established neural computations via a normalization model of attention. Both endogenous and exogenous attention similarly improved performance at the attended location by enhancing the gain of all orientations without changing tuning width. In the SF dimension, endogenous attention enhanced the gain of SFs above and below the target SF, whereas exogenous attention only enhanced those above. Additionally, exogenous attention shifted peak sensitivity to SFs above the target SF, whereas endogenous attention did not. Both covert attention systems modulated sensory tuning via the same computation (gain changes). However, there were differences in the strength of the gain. Compared with endogenous attention, exogenous attention had a stronger orientation gain enhancement but a weaker overall SF gain enhancement. These differences in sensory tuning may underlie differential effects of endogenous and exogenous attention on performance.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionBrainFemaleHumansMaleVisual Perceptionendogenous attentionexogenous attentionr correlationsensory tuningspatial vision

Identifiers

PMID34965975
PMCPMC8883865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.