Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34965953›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022

Predictive Biomarkers of Overall Survival in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with IFNα ± Bevacizumab: Results from CALGB 90206 (Alliance).

Andrew B Nixon, Susan Halabi, Yingmiao Liu, Mark D Starr, John C Brady, Ivo Shterev, Bin Luo, Herbert I Hurwitz, Phillip G Febbo, Brian I Rini and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Characterization of the Biological Variability of the Angiome Biomarkers over Time in Healthy Participants.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew B Nixon *Department of Medical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-3971-2964
Susan Halabi *Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics and Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-4135-2777
Yingmiao LiuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Mark D StarrDepartment of Medical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
John C BradyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Ivo ShterevDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics and Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Bin LuoDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics and Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-3983-5676
Herbert I HurwitzGenentech, South San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0003-3242-9197
Phillip G FebboIllumina Inc., Redwood City, California.ORCID 0000-0002-6496-4664
Brian I RiniDepartment of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center, Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Himisha BeltranDepartment of Medicine, Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Eric J SmallDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Michael J MorrisDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-9454-0096
Daniel J GeorgeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-1499-7203
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USDana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center · USIllumina (United States) · USKaiser Permanente South San Francisco Medical Center · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
Statistics CoreU10CA180882 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Sumithra Jay Mandrekar · 2014 to 2026
$115.0M
THE ALLIANCE NCTN BIOREPOSITORY AND BIOSPECIMEN RESOURCEU24CA196171 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Mine Cicek, Wendy Frankel · 2015 to 2026
$35.0M
Network Lead Academic Participating Site: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterUG1CA233290 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CAROL AGHAJANIAN, Darren Feldman · 2019 to 2026
$10.2M
NCTN Lead Academic Participating Site at Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer CareUG1CA233180 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Harold John Burstein · 2019 to 2026
$8.6M
The Duke University - Duke Cancer Institute National Clinical Trials Network LAPS (UG1) Support GrantUG1CA233253 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI John H Strickler, Alexandra Thomas · 2019 to 2026
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180882NCI NIH HHS U24 CA196171NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233180NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233253NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCALGB 90206 was a phase III trial of 732 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) comparing bevacizumab plus IFNα (BEV + IFN) with IFNα alone (IFN). No difference in overall survival (OS) was observed. Baseline samples were analyzed to identify predictive biomarkers for survival benefit. PATIENTS AND

methodsA total of 32 biomarkers were assessed in 498 consenting patients randomly assigned into training (n = 279) and testing (n = 219) sets. The proportional hazards model was used to test for treatment arm and biomarker interactions of OS. The estimated coefficients from the training set were used to compute a risk score for each patient and to classify patients by risk in the testing set. The resulting model was assessed for predictive accuracy using the time-dependent area under the ROC curve (tAUROC).

resultsA statistically significant three-way interaction between IL6, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and bevacizumab treatment was observed in the training set and confirmed in the testing set (P < 0.0001). The model based on IL6, HGF, and bevacizumab treatment was predictive of OS (P < 0.001), with the high- and low-risk groups having a median OS of 10.2 [95% confidence interval (CI), 8.0-13.8] and 34.3 (95% CI, 28.5-40.5) months, respectively. The average tAUROC for the final model of OS based on 100 randomly split testing sets was 0.78 (first, third quartiles = 0.77, 0.79).

conclusionsIL6 and HGF are potential predictive biomarkers of OS benefit from BEV + IFN in patients with mRCC. The model based on key biological and clinical factors demonstrated predictive efficacy for OS. These markers warrant further validation in future anti-VEGF and immunotherapy in mRCC trials. See related commentaries by Mishkin and Kohn, p. 2722 and George and Bertagnolli, p. 2725.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabBiomarkersDisease-Free SurvivalGenotypeHumansInterferon-alphaInterleukin-6PhenotypeBevacizumabBiomarkersInterferon-alphaInterleukin-6

Identifiers

PMID34965953
PMCPMC9240110
OpenAlexW4200406896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.