Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34965901›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2022

COVID-19 Vaccination and Intent Among Healthcare Personnel, U.S.

Hilda Razzaghi, Svetlana Masalovich, Anup Srivastav, Carla L Black, Kimberly H Nguyen, Marie A de Perio, A Scott Laney, James A Singleton

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Vaccines and the social amplification of risk.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hilda RazzaghiCDC COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: hrazzaghi@cdc.gov.
Svetlana MasalovichKapili Government Services, LLC, Atlanta, Georgia.
Anup SrivastavLeidos, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia.
Carla L BlackCDC COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Kimberly H NguyenCDC COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Marie A de PerioCDC COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
A Scott LaneyCDC COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
James A SingletonCDC COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USLeidos (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealthcare personnel are at increased risk for COVID-19 from workplace exposure. National estimates on COVID-19 vaccination coverage among healthcare personnel are limited.

methodsData from an opt-in Internet panel survey of 2,434 healthcare personnel, conducted on March 30, 2021-April 15, 2021, were analyzed to assess the receipt of ≥1 dose of a COVID-19 vaccine and vaccination intent. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination and intent for vaccination.

resultsOverall, 68.2% of healthcare personnel reported a receipt of ≥1 dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, 9.8% would probably/definitely get vaccinated, 7.1% were unsure, and 14.9% would probably/definitely not get vaccinated. COVID-19 vaccination coverage was highest among physicians (89.0%), healthcare personnel working in hospitals (75.0%), and healthcare personnel of non-Hispanic White or other race (75.7%-77.4%). Healthcare personnel who received influenza vaccine in 2020-2021 (adjusted prevalence ratio=1.92) and those aged ≥60 years (adjusted prevalence ratio=1.37) were more likely to report a receipt of ≥1 dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. Non-Hispanic Black healthcare personnel (adjusted prevalence ratio=0.74), nurse practitioners/physician assistants (adjusted prevalence ratio=0.55), assistants/aides (adjusted prevalence ratio=0.73), and nonclinical healthcare personnel (adjusted prevalence ratio=0.79) were less likely to have received a COVID-19 vaccine. The common reasons for vaccination included protecting self (88.1%), family and friends (86.3%), and patients (69.2%) from COVID-19. The most common reason for nonvaccination was concern about side effects and safety of COVID-19 vaccine (59.7%).

conclusionsUnderstanding vaccination status and intent among healthcare personnel is important for addressing barriers to vaccination. Addressing concerns on side effects, safety, and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines as well as their fast development and approval may help improve vaccination coverage among healthcare personnel.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansIntentionVaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34965901
PMCPMC8710229
OpenAlexW4200235142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.