Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34965775›Full record

ArticlePalliative medicine2022

Patient perspectives on states worse than death: A qualitative study with implications for patient-centered outcomes and values elicitation.

Catherine L Auriemma, Helen O'Donnell, Julia Jones, Zoe Barbati, Eda Akpek, Tamar Klaiman, Scott D Halpern

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Dyadic-concordance death-preparedness states and end-of-life care received by cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Hospital-free days: A novel measure to study outcomes for emergency department care.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Catherine L AuriemmaPalliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4803-0375
Helen O'DonnellPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Julia JonesCollege of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Zoe BarbatiMixed Methods Research Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Eda AkpekMixed Methods Research Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Tamar KlaimanPalliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Scott D HalpernPalliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Training in Critical Care Health Policy ResearchT32HL098054 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Scott D Halpern · 2010 to 2026
$8.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL098054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeriously ill patients rate several health outcomes as states worse than death. It is unclear what factors underlie such valuations, and whether consideration of such states is useful when making medical decisions.

aimWe sought to (1) use qualitative approaches to identify states worse than death, (2) identify attributes common to such undesirable health states, and (3) determine how participants might use information on these states in making medical decisions.

designQualitative study of semi-structured interviews utilizing content analysis with constant comparison techniques. SETTING,

participantsWe interviewed adults age 65 or older with serious illnesses after discharge home from one of two urban, academic hospitals. Eligible patients were purposively sampled to achieve balance in gender and race.

resultsOf 29 participants, 15 (52%) were female, and 15 were white (52%), with a median age of 72 (interquartile range 69, 75). Various physical, cognitive, and social impairments were identified as states worse than death. The most commonly reported attributes underlying states worse than death were perceived burden on loved ones and inability to maintain human connection. Patients believed information on states worse than death must be individualized, and were concerned their opinions could change with time and fluctuations in health status.

conclusionsCommon factors underlying undesirable states suggest that for care to be patient-centered it must also be family-centered. Patients' views on using states worse than death in decision making highlight barriers to using avoidance of such states as a quality measure, but also suggest opportunities for eliciting patients' values.

Indexed as

Health StatusPatient-Centered CareAdultAgedDecision MakingFemaleHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareQualitative Researchoutcome measuresPatient-centered carequalitative evaluationsocial valuesstate worse than death

Identifiers

PMID34965775
PMCPMC9813946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.