ArticleUrologia internationalis2022
Decreasing Number of Urodynamics in Urological and Gynaecological Clinics Reflects Decreased Importance for Surgical Indications: German Population-Based Data from 2013 to 2019.
Article in Urologia internationalis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Urodynamics in Germany: Indications and Application in Urological Hospital and Practice Settings].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Automated Evaluation of Urodynamic Examinations Through Local Linear Models: Validation on Spinal Cord Injury Individuals.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2025Article
- Declining utilization of urodynamic studies in urological care in Germany: time to say goodbye?World journal of urology · 2024Article
- Diagnoses and Treatment Recommendations-Interrater Reliability of Uroflowmetry in People with Multiple Sclerosis.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- The Role of the Supine Empty Stress Test in the Evaluation of Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- [Imaging of the pelvic floor : The urological perspective].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Do or Don't: Results of a Multinational Survey on Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Urodynamics.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe routine use of urodynamic studies (UDS) has been questioned. Additionally, the material and personnel costs are poorly remunerated. We aimed to analyse the UDS utilization in Germany.
methodsWe analysed UDS performed by hospitals based on quality reports from 2013 to 2019. A representative sample of 4 million insured persons was used to estimate outpatient UDS utilization from 2013 to 2018.
resultsThere was an overall decrease of 14% in UDS in Germany from 2013 to 2018 (60,980 to 52,319; p = 0.003). In the outpatient sector, there was a slight non-continuous drop of 11% from 34,551 to 30,652 from 2013 to 2018 (p = 0.06). UDS utilization in hospitals decreased by 26% from 26,429 in 2013 to 19,453 in 2019 (p = 0.004). University hospitals showed a smaller decrease (3,007 to 2,685; p = 0.02). In urology, the number of UDS (11,758 to 6,409; p < 0.001) and the number of performing departments (328 to 263 clinics; p < 0.001) decreased. Gynaecological departments also showed a decrease in UDS (1,861 to 866; p < 0.001) and performing departments (159 to 68; p < 0.001). However, in paediatrics, there was an increase in UDS (1,564 to 2,192; p = 0.02). By age, the number of children remained constant (1,371 to 1,252; p = 0.2), but there was a strong decrease seen in 60- to 79-year-olds (9,792 to 5,564; p < 0.001).
conclusionUDS appear to be less important in the indication for surgery. Despite high resource expenditure and low remuneration, the decrease in urodynamics in the outpatient sector is less pronounced, indicating a trend to perform UDS in an outpatient setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.