Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34965498›Full record

ArticleMidwifery2022

Improving uptake of vaccines in pregnancy: A service evaluation of an antenatal vaccination clinic at a tertiary hospital in the UK.

Kate Mi Ralph, Robert B Dorey, Rebecca Rowe, Christine E Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Midwifery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Vaccination in pregnancy: The role of the midwife.Frontiers in global women's health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kate Mi RalphFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom. Electronic address: kmir1g17@soton.ac.uk.
Robert B DoreyNIHR Clinical Research Facility, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom. Electronic address: R.Dorey@soton.ac.uk.
Rebecca RowePrincess Anne Hospital, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Rebecca.Rowe@uhs.nhs.uk.
Christine E JonesFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom. Electronic address: C.E.Jones@soton.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccination against pertussis and seasonal influenza is recommended for all pregnant women in the UK. More recently COVID-19 vaccination has also been offered to women in pregnancy.

objectivesTo evaluate the uptake of vaccines in pregnant women within a midwife-led immunisation clinic and to assess factors influencing pregnant women's decisions about accepting vaccination.

methodsUptake of vaccines amongst pregnant women referred to a single UK centre for antenatal care between 01/01/19 and 02/10/19 was assessed. Interviews with 20 pregnant women explored views of antenatal vaccination and experiences of the vaccination service.

findingsAmongst 4420 women, uptake was 90.6% for pertussis and 78.8% for influenza vaccines. Factors influencing vaccine-related decision-making amongst 20 interviewed women were: healthcare professional recommendation, perceived susceptibility and risk of infection, and previous experience of vaccination and vaccine-preventable disease. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Uptake of pertussis and influenza vaccines within a secondary care immunisation service was higher than the national or regional average. The model of vaccine delivery was associated with high levels of satisfaction. This model of vaccine delivery could be implemented elsewhere to increase vaccine uptake, and should be considered for delivery of COVID-19 vaccines in the future.

Indexed as

COVID-19Pregnancy Complications, InfectiousCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CarePertussis VaccinePregnancyPregnant PeopleSARS-CoV-2Tertiary Care CentersUnited KingdomVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesPertussis VaccineExperienceImmunisationInfluenzaPertussisPregnancyVaccination

Identifiers

PMID34965498
PMCPMC8639287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.