Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34965248›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Designing the best breeding strategy for Coffea canephora: Genetic evaluation of pure and hybrid individuals aiming to select for productivity and disease resistance traits.

Emilly Ruas Alkimim, Eveline Teixeira Caixeta, Tiago Vieira Sousa, Itamara Bomfim Gois, Felipe Lopes da Silva, Ney Sussumu Sakiyama, Laércio Zambolim, Rodrigo Silva Alves, Marcos Deon Vilela de Resende

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genetic improvement of robusta coffee (Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emilly Ruas AlkimimFederal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Iturama, MG, Brazil.
Eveline Teixeira CaixetaBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation-Embrapa Café, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Tiago Vieira SousaFederal Institute of Triângulo Mineiro, Campina Verde, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7774-5762
Itamara Bomfim GoisFederal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Felipe Lopes da SilvaFederal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Ney Sussumu SakiyamaFederal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Laércio ZambolimFederal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Rodrigo Silva AlvesNational Institute of Coffee Science and Technology-INCT Café, Lavras, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3038-6210
Marcos Deon Vilela de ResendeBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation-Embrapa Café, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3087-3588

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breeding programs of the species Coffea canephora rely heavily on the significant genetic variability between and within its two varietal groups (conilon and robusta). The use of hybrid families and individuals has been less common. The objectives of this study were to evaluate parents and families from the populations of conilon, robusta, and its hybrids and to define the best breeding and selection strategies for productivity and disease resistance traits. As such, 71 conilon clones, 56 robusta clones, and 20 hybrid families were evaluated over several years for the following traits: vegetative vigor, incidence of rust and cercosporiosis, fruit ripening time, fruit size, plant height, canopy diameter, and yield per plant. Components of variance and genetic parameters were estimated via residual maximum likelihood (REML) and genotypic values were predicted via best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP). Genetic variability among parents (clones) and hybrid families was detected for most of the evaluated traits. The Mulamba-Rank index suggests potential gains up to 17% for the genotypic aggregate of traits in the hybrid population. An intrapopulation recurrent selection within the hybrid population would be the best breeding strategy because the genetic variability, narrow and broad senses heritabilities and selective accuracies for important traits were maximized in the crossed population. Besides, such strategy is simple, low cost and quicker than the concurrent reciprocal recurrent selection in the two parental populations, and this maximizes the genetic gain for unit of time.

Indexed as

Hybridization, GeneticPlant BreedingQuantitative Trait, HeritableCoffeaDisease ResistanceEnvironmentGenotypeLikelihood FunctionsPlant Diseases

Identifiers

PMID34965248
PMCPMC8716045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.