Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34964996›Full record

Trial reportJournal of surgical oncology2022

High concordance of 70-gene recurrence risk signature and 80-gene molecular subtyping signature between core needle biopsy and surgical resection specimens in early-stage breast cancer.

Jennifer A Crozier, Julie Barone, Pat Whitworth, Abraham Cheong, Robert Maganini, Jose Perez Tamayo, Patricia Dauer, Shiyu Wang, William Audeh, Annuska M Glas

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03053193 (MammaPrint, BluePrint, and Full-genome Data Linked With Clinical Data to Evaluate New Gene EXpression Profiles), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03053193 recruitingnot on this map

MammaPrint, BluePrint, and Full-genome Data Linked With Clinical Data to Evaluate New Gene EXpression Profiles: An Adaptable Registry (FLEX)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAgendiaRan2017 to 2037Enrolled30,000ConditionsBreast CancerArmsMammaPrint, BluePrint, and Full-Genome Testing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer A CrozierDivision of Hematology & Oncology, Baptist MD Anderson, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Julie BaroneSCL Health, St. Joseph's Hospital, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Pat WhitworthDepartment of Surgery, Nashville Breast Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Abraham CheongDivision of Hematology & Oncology, Southeast Georgia Health System, Brunswick, Georgia, USA.
Robert MaganiniDivision of Oncology, AMITA Health Alexian Brothers, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, USA.
Jose Perez TamayoDepartment of Radiology, Ogden Regional Medical Center, Ogden, Utah, USA.
Patricia DauerDivision of Medical Affairs, Agendia Inc., Irvine, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8374-5512
Shiyu WangDivision of Medical Affairs, Agendia Inc., Irvine, California, USA.
William AudehDivision of Medical Affairs, Agendia Inc., Irvine, California, USA.
Annuska M GlasDivision of R&D, Agendia NV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0775-138X
Agendia (Netherlands) · NLAlexian Brothers Health System · USArnot Ogden Medical Center · USBaptist Medical Center Jacksonville · USNashville Oncology Associates · USSoutheast Georgia Health System · USSt. Joseph Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesWith increased neoadjuvant therapy recommendations for early-stage breast cancer patients due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is imperative that molecular diagnostic assays provide reliable results from preoperative core needle biopsies (CNB). The study objective was to determine the concordance of MammaPrint and BluePrint results between matched CNB and surgical resection (SR) specimens.

methodsMatched tumor specimens (n = 121) were prospectively collected from women enrolled in the FLEX trial (NCT03053193). Concordance is reported using overall percentage agreement and Cohen's kappa coefficient. Correlation is reported using Pearson correlation coefficient.

resultsWe found good concordance for MammaPrint results between matched tumor samples (90.9%, κ = 0.817), and a very strong correlation of MammaPrint indices (r = 0.94). The concordance of BluePrint subtyping in matched samples was also excellent (98.3%).

conclusionsCNB samples demonstrated high concordance with paired SR samples for MammaPrint risk classification and BluePrint molecular subtyping, suggesting that physicians are provided with accurate prognostic information that can be used to guide therapy decisions.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision RulesGenomicsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentBiomarkers, TumorBluePrintbreast cancercore needle biopsyCOVID-19 pandemicgenomic profileMammaPrint

Identifiers

PMID34964996
PMCPMC9305900
OpenAlexW4200395239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.