ReviewPerspectives on medical education2022
The do's, don'ts and don't knows of redressing differential attainment related to race/ethnicity in medical schools.
Review in Perspectives on medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Differential attainment within medical education: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Factors influencing ethnic minority medical students' performance in second sit examination.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Melanin Medics: lessons from a community-led organization addressing inequities in medical education.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Balancing act-ethnic minority trainees' coping strategies in Dutch GP-specialty training-a qualitative study.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Adverse Childhood Experiences, Psychological Distress, and Resilience in Health Professions Students.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2025Article
- How can we promote gender and sex equality in orthopaedics and traumatology surgery? Research avenues perspectives.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Review
- Clarifying and expanding equity in assessment by considering three orientations: Fairness, inclusion and justice.Medical education · 2025Review
- Differential attainment in UK postgraduate medical examinations: examining the relationship between sociodemographic differences and examination performance.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Student Medical Education Masterclasses: Diversifying the Academic Pipeline.The clinical teacher · 2025Article
- Big data analysis: examination of the relationship between candidates' sociodemographic characteristics and performance in the UK's Membership of the Royal College of Physicians Part 1 examination.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2025Article
- Differential attainment at national selection for higher surgical training: a retrospective cohort study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Inclusive Research in Medical Education: Strategies to Improve Scholarship and Cultivate Scholars.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Recommendations to address and research systemic bias in assessment: perspectives from directors of research in medical education.Medical education online · 2024Article
- Exploring the educational journey: perspectives of ethnic minority GP-trainees in Dutch GP-specialty training - a qualitative interview study.International journal for equity in health · 2024Article
- A framework for decolonising and diversifying biomedical sciences curricula: rediscovery, representation and readiness.FEBS open bio · 2024Article
- Time to normalise protected characteristics in written assessments: A pilot study.MedEdPublish (2016) · 2024Article
- Article
- 'Where are youBMJ open · 2023Article
- Performance of ethnic minority versus White doctors in the MRCGP assessment 2016-2021: a cross-sectional study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023Observational
- By Medical Students, for Medical Students: A Narrative Medicine Antiracism Program.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSystematic and structural inequities in power and privilege create differential attainment whereby differences in average levels of performance are observed between students from different socio-demographic groups. This paper reviews the international evidence on differential attainment related to ethnicity/race in medical school, drawing together the key messages from research to date to provide guidance for educators to operationalize and enact change and identify areas for further research.
methodsAuthors first identified areas of conceptual importance within differential attainment (learning, assessment, and systems/institutional factors) which were then the focus of a targeted review of the literature on differential attainment related to ethnicity/race in medical education and, where available and relevant, literature from higher education more generally. Each author then conducted a review of the literature and proposed guidelines based on their experience and research literature. The guidelines were iteratively reviewed and refined between all authors until we reached consensus on the Do's, Don'ts and Don't Knows.
resultsWe present 13 guidelines with a summary of the research evidence for each. Guidelines address assessment practices (assessment design, assessment formats, use of assessments and post-hoc analysis) and educational systems and cultures (student experience, learning environment, faculty diversity and diversity practices).
conclusionsDifferential attainment related to ethnicity/race is a complex, systemic problem reflective of unequal norms and practices within broader society and evident throughout assessment practices, the learning environment and student experiences at medical school. Currently, the strongest empirical evidence is around assessment processes themselves. There is emerging evidence of minoritized students facing discrimination and having different learning experiences in medical school, but more studies are needed. There is a pressing need for research on how to effectively redress systemic issues within our medical schools, particularly related to inequity in teaching and learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.