Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34964930›Full record

ReviewPerspectives on medical education2022

The do's, don'ts and don't knows of redressing differential attainment related to race/ethnicity in medical schools.

Molly Fyfe, Jo Horsburgh, Julia Blitz, Neville Chiavaroli, Sonia Kumar, Jennifer Cleland

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Perspectives on medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Adverse Childhood Experiences, Psychological Distress, and Resilience in Health Professions Students.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. 'Where are youBMJ open · 2023
    Article
  19. Performance of ethnic minority versus White doctors in the MRCGP assessment 2016-2021: a cross-sectional study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Molly FyfeMedical Education Innovation and Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Jo HorsburghMedical Education Innovation and Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Julia BlitzCentre for Health Professions Education, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Neville ChiavaroliAustralian Council for Educational Research, Melbourne, Australia.
Sonia KumarMedical Education Innovation and Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Jennifer ClelandLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore. Jennifer.cleland@ntu.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1433-9323

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSystematic and structural inequities in power and privilege create differential attainment whereby differences in average levels of performance are observed between students from different socio-demographic groups. This paper reviews the international evidence on differential attainment related to ethnicity/race in medical school, drawing together the key messages from research to date to provide guidance for educators to operationalize and enact change and identify areas for further research.

methodsAuthors first identified areas of conceptual importance within differential attainment (learning, assessment, and systems/institutional factors) which were then the focus of a targeted review of the literature on differential attainment related to ethnicity/race in medical education and, where available and relevant, literature from higher education more generally. Each author then conducted a review of the literature and proposed guidelines based on their experience and research literature. The guidelines were iteratively reviewed and refined between all authors until we reached consensus on the Do's, Don'ts and Don't Knows.

resultsWe present 13 guidelines with a summary of the research evidence for each. Guidelines address assessment practices (assessment design, assessment formats, use of assessments and post-hoc analysis) and educational systems and cultures (student experience, learning environment, faculty diversity and diversity practices).

conclusionsDifferential attainment related to ethnicity/race is a complex, systemic problem reflective of unequal norms and practices within broader society and evident throughout assessment practices, the learning environment and student experiences at medical school. Currently, the strongest empirical evidence is around assessment processes themselves. There is emerging evidence of minoritized students facing discrimination and having different learning experiences in medical school, but more studies are needed. There is a pressing need for research on how to effectively redress systemic issues within our medical schools, particularly related to inequity in teaching and learning.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalSchools, MedicalEthnicityHumansLearningStudentsAssessmentDifferential attainmentEthnicityLearning environmentMedical educationRacism

Identifiers

PMID34964930
PMCPMC8714874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.