ArticleActa oto-laryngologica2022
Examining the consequences of tinnitus using the multidimensional perspective.
Article in Acta oto-laryngologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between Tinnitus and Auditory Middle Latency Response: An Exploratory Study.Journal of otology · 2026Article
- Exploring the Impact of Misophonia Through the Lens of the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Framework.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · 2025Article
- Development and Psychometric Validation of Tinnitus Qualities and Impact Questionnaire.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
- Individuals with Tinnitus Report More Positive Experiences following Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy.Clinics and practice · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTinnitus is one of the most frequent chronic conditions in adults with wide range of consequences. AIMS/
objectivesThe aim of the current study was to determine the problems and life effects reported by individuals with tinnitus using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe study used a cross-sectional survey design. A total of 344 individuals with tinnitus completed a series of questionnaires. The responses to open-ended questions were linked to ICF categories.
resultsActivity limitations and participation restrictions were most dominant consequence of tinnitus followed by effect on the body function with limited emphasis on the contextual factors. Frequently reported responses to body function involved emotional functions (b152), attention function (b140), and sleep functions (b134). Commonly reported responses to activity limitations and participation restrictions were recreation and leisure (d920), conversation (d350), communicating with-receiving-spoken messages (d310), listening (d115), and remunerative employment (d850). Sound intensity (e2500) and sound quality (e2501) were the frequently reported responses to environmental factors. Coping styles, past and present experiences, and lifestyle were the most frequently occurring personal factors. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: The study highlighted some key influencing factors of tinnitus in different ICF domains which can be helpful in rehabilitation planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.