Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34964473›Full record

ArticleHuman molecular genetics2022

Interpreting ciliopathy-associated missense variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Karen I Lange, Sunayna Best, Sofia Tsiropoulou, Ian Berry, Colin A Johnson, Oliver E Blacque

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human molecular genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Kinesins inOpen biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Functional analysis ofGenetics in medicine open · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen I LangeSchool of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-2414-5277
Sunayna BestDivision of Molecular Medicine, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK.
Sofia TsiropoulouSchool of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Ian BerryBristol Genetics Laboratory, Pathology Sciences, Southmead Hospital, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK.
Colin A JohnsonDivision of Molecular Medicine, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK.
Oliver E BlacqueSchool of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
University College Dublin · IEUniversity of Leeds · GBSouthmead Hospital · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council 16/BBSRC/3394Medical Research Council MR/K011154/1Medical Research Council MR/M000532/1Wellcome Trust 203914/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Better methods are required to interpret the pathogenicity of disease-associated variants of uncertain significance (VUS), which cannot be actioned clinically. In this study, we explore the use of an animal model (Caenorhabditis elegans) for in vivo interpretation of missense VUS alleles of TMEM67, a cilia gene associated with ciliopathies. CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing was used to generate homozygous knock-in C. elegans worm strains carrying TMEM67 patient variants engineered into the orthologous gene (mks-3). Quantitative phenotypic assays of sensory cilia structure and function (neuronal dye filling, roaming and chemotaxis assays) measured how the variants impacted mks-3 gene function. Effects of the variants on mks-3 function were further investigated by looking at MKS-3::GFP localization and cilia ultrastructure. The quantitative assays in C. elegans accurately distinguished between known benign (Asp359Glu, Thr360Ala) and known pathogenic (Glu361Ter, Gln376Pro) variants. Analysis of eight missense VUS generated evidence that three are benign (Cys173Arg, Thr176Ile and Gly979Arg) and five are pathogenic (Cys170Tyr, His782Arg, Gly786Glu, His790Arg and Ser961Tyr). Results from worms were validated by a genetic complementation assay in a human TMEM67 knock-out hTERT-RPE1 cell line that tests a TMEM67 signalling function. We conclude that efficient genome editing and quantitative functional assays in C. elegans make it a tractable in vivo animal model for rapid, cost-effective interpretation of ciliopathy-associated missense VUS alleles.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegans ProteinsCiliopathiesAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCiliaGene EditingHumansMutation, MissenseCaenorhabditis elegans Proteins

Identifiers

PMID34964473
PMCPMC9122650
OpenAlexW4200009558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.