Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34964295›Full record

ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2021

ON-rep-seq as a rapid and cost-effective alternative to whole-genome sequencing for species-level identification and strain-level discrimination of Listeria monocytogenes contamination in a salmon processing plant.

Gunn Merethe Bjørge Thomassen, Lukasz Krych, Susanne Knøchel, Lisbeth Mehli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. High Disinfectant Tolerance inMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  3. A Comprehensive Virulence and Resistance Characteristics ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gunn Merethe Bjørge ThomassenDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1733-642X
Lukasz KrychDepartment of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Susanne KnøchelDepartment of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Lisbeth MehliDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification, source tracking, and surveillance of food pathogens are crucial factors for the food-producing industry. Over the last decade, the techniques used for this have moved from conventional enrichment methods, through species-specific detection by PCR to sequencing-based methods, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) being the ultimate method. However, using WGS requires the right infrastructure, high computational power, and bioinformatics expertise. Therefore, there is a need for faster, more cost-effective, and more user-friendly methods. A newly developed method, ON-rep-seq, combines the classical rep-PCR method with nanopore sequencing, resulting in a highly discriminating set of sequences that can be used for species identification and also strain discrimination. This study is essentially a real industry case from a salmon processing plant. Twenty Listeria monocytogenes isolates were analyzed both by ON-rep-seq and WGS to identify and differentiate putative L. monocytogenes from a routine sampling of processing equipment and products, and finally, compare the strain-level discriminatory power of ON-rep-seq to different analyzing levels delivered from the WGS data. The analyses revealed that among the isolates tested there were three different strains. The isolates of the most frequently detected strain (n = 15) were all detected in the problematic area in the processing plant. The strain level discrimination done by ON-rep-seq was in full accordance with the interpretation of WGS data. Our findings also demonstrate that ON-rep-seq may serve as a primary screening method alternative to WGS for identification and strain-level differentiation for surveillance of potential pathogens in a food-producing environment.

Indexed as

Food MicrobiologyFood-Processing IndustryNanopore SequencingPolymerase Chain ReactionAnimalsCost-Benefit AnalysisGenome, BacterialListeria monocytogenesPhylogenySalmonSequence Analysis, DNAWhole Genome Sequencingfoodborne pathogenListeria monocytogenesON-rep-seqOxford Nanopore technologywhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID34964295
PMCPMC8591450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.