Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34964179›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2022

Comparison of interpolation methods of predominant cardiomyocyte orientation from in vivo and ex vivo cardiac diffusion tensor imaging data.

Johanna Stimm, Christian Guenthner, Sebastian Kozerke, Christian T Stoeck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johanna StimmInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8772-8333
Christian GuenthnerInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8707-7016
Sebastian KozerkeInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christian T StoeckInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8670-0929

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac electrophysiology and cardiac mechanics both depend on the average cardiomyocyte long-axis orientation. In the realm of personalized medicine, knowledge of the patient-specific changes in cardiac microstructure plays a crucial role. Patient-specific computational modelling has emerged as a tool to better understand disease progression. In vivo cardiac diffusion tensor imaging (cDTI) is a vital tool to non-destructively measure the average cardiomyocyte long-axis orientation in the heart. However, cDTI suffers from long scan times, rendering volumetric, high-resolution acquisitions challenging. Consequently, interpolation techniques are needed to populate bio-mechanical models with patient-specific average cardiomyocyte long-axis orientations. In this work, we compare five interpolation techniques applied to in vivo and ex vivo porcine input data. We compare two tensor interpolation approaches, one rule-based approximation, and two data-driven, low-rank models. We demonstrate the advantage of tensor interpolation techniques, resulting in lower interpolation errors than do low-rank models and rule-based methods adapted to cDTI data. In an ex vivo comparison, we study the influence of three imaging parameters that can be traded off against acquisition time: in-plane resolution, signal to noise ratio, and number of acquired short-axis imaging slices.

Indexed as

Diffusion Tensor ImagingMyocytes, CardiacAnimalsHumansSignal-To-Noise RatioSwine3D cardiac microstructureaverage cardiomyocyte long-axis orientation interpolationcardiac diffusion tensor imaging (cDTI)low-rank modelpersonalized modellingrule-based methodtensor interpolation

Identifiers

PMID34964179
PMCPMC9285076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.